Research On Academic Works’ Credibility Evaluation

As aspecial information resource, Academic works assumed a very important role in the process of research and academic exchange. in the gradual process of practice evaluation needs of academic works. Relative to the papers, however, whether it is the theoretical basis of the model structures or evaluation of data collected in a more junior stage. This paper intends to start from the basis of characteristics-credibility evaluation studies of academic works, and explore the ideas and methods of a comprehensive evaluation of academic works.Firstly, analysis and definition of the basic meaning of academic works and its credibility. In order to simplify the research process, accurate research objectives, draw the meaning of academic works on the basis of comparing the differences between different academic publications and features, emphasizing academic works is the unity of content and form, as well as special products which has standardized market characteristics. The reality of the credibility of the history of the origin and development of fully taken into account in the definition of the concept of academic writings credibility, clear the characteristics of credibility itself contains both qualities but also reflects the interaction between themselves and the audience. This definition, defining the direction for the follow-up study.The premise clear research direction and goals, the paper described by way of literature review about the credibility of the progress and current status of book reviews, information resource evaluation. Selected on the basis of the two aspects of the case and the basis of the theory of the specific analysis:First, the analysis and summary of the theory and practice of the Book Evaluation. Including procurement and collections of library resources evaluation perspective, from the perspective of the publishing houses academic topics, from the perspective of research evaluation and national funding or guide books contest angle specific analysis of the credibility of its influence on academic books factors and indicators.The second is to analyze the case of information credibility evaluation, mainly draws on the evaluation of the credibility of the network of information resources to establish and evaluation methods. Understanding and on the basis of summing up the above-mentioned types of cases, the paper analyzed in Chapter3, specifically the academic works of the participants (including the authors, editing, processing, communicators, evaluators and audience) characteristics and influencing factors, and Based on this analysis the academic writings generation, processing, dissemination and application process, the relationship between the factors and factors related to a preliminary understanding of the credibility of the academic works.On the basis of the above analysis, the paper primaries to establish the credibility of the academic works evaluation index system, Delphi survey of experts established academic works in accordance with aspects of the source of information, information processing, information dissemination and information applications credible degree evaluation model.On the basis of the integrated model, the paper divided into specific academic writings credibility evaluation model source credibility, editing credibility, spread of credibility and the credibility of the four sub-models, respectively, to establish their respective The method of evaluation index system and data collection and collation.To verify the correctness of the theoretical point of view and the validity of the model, the paper Chapter5Special select the part of the basis of medical ultrasound medical academic writings verify the simplified model and data collection in the verification process, simplified processing, the final results the basic verify the validity of the model.Thesis Chapter6major analysis of academic works to the credibility of the specific application of the evaluation model proposed use of the model is the core of the evaluation and the establishment of the integrity of research files before publication in order to improve the source and content credibility, published in the introduction of core publishing The concept of community and strengthen the building of the Press academic editing capabilities and the ability to communicate, to enhance the building of the academic writings academic influence after publication. Comprehensively improve the credibility of scholarly works, the paper also proposed the establishment of the publication of academic works, dissemination and evaluation of the "trinity" model envisages publishing difficult to comprehensively address the academic works, the issue is difficult and hard to evaluate the situation.Finally, the future study of the evaluation of the credibility of scholarly works looking further research can include aspects of the comprehensive evaluation and the network environment, the impact of the evaluation of the credibility of the academic works of academic works.