Quantitative Research On Academic Fluctuations

In the era of information technology,scientific research is an important manifestation of a country's comprehensive strength.The "14th Five-Year Plan" clearly proposes to improve the talent evaluation and incentive mechanism,and actively promote scientific and technological open cooperation.As a part of scientific research,the measurement and analysis of academic achievements of scholars is not only directly related to the quality evaluation of academic research and the reasonable performance of academic achievements,but also affects the allocation of related resources and the healthy development of the academic circle.For scientific research groups and institutions in various fields,it is becoming more and more important to judge academic achievements in an objective,fair and complete manner,and it is a hot topic in the field of scientometrics.There are a wide variety of existing academic measurement indicators and a wide range of definitions,but there are few studies on the unstable fluctuations in academic performance of scholars in their research careers.The academic performance and research interests of scholars are not consistent.Therefore,the evaluation of academic achievements should consider the unstable phenomena that change over time,so as to more completely and accurately measure the academic achievements,and fully explore the scientific research status and career of scientific researchers.Changes in trajectories and academic interests will promote the soundness of the evaluation system and the construction of cooperative innovation networks.Based on a review of the existing academic evaluation indicators,this article finds that there is a lack of relevant indicators to measure the unstable performance of scholars in the scientific research process.Based on this,this article proposes the concept of academic fluctuations,based on the citation analysis and themes of the papers published by the scholars.Analyze and construct a quantitative analysis framework,and propose two academic volatility indicators: academic volatility index and academic volatility.Empirical research is carried out from the two perspectives of academic volatility index and academic volatility,which are carried out from the two perspectives of academic evaluation and academic recommendation based on academic volatility index,respectively,and then provide the incentive system for talent evaluation and open science and technology cooperation and innovation system.Perfect and provide ideas.By integrating the academic fluctuation index and multiple existing evaluation indicators,it is helpful to make reasonable indicator selection and process optimization in the evaluation process of scholars.At the same time,combined with academic age,the characteristics and laws of scholars in different periods can be more comprehensively measured.,To make an attempt to build a more complete academic evaluation system,and to make relevant suggestions to scholars,readers,and journals,which will help researchers to discover the law of growth and scientific research activities and the construction of a new evaluation system.Through the combination of academic volatility and academic recommendation,it is possible to accurately capture the volatility characteristics of scholars in their careers,accurately formulate recommendations for academic themes,recommend high-precision academic cooperation,and accurately position personal academic career development trajectories and future development paths.Scholars who have potential for cooperation will make relevant suggestions for scientific research cooperation,which will help the development of major scientific and technological cooperation projects and the construction of global innovation networks.The essence and goal of scientific activities is to discover the laws of the world.While recording and quantifying unstable academic fluctuations,the academic volatility index and academic volatility also deeply dig and predict the evolutionary path of scientific research,which provides a way to enrich the knowledge system of the overall process of scientific research.Kind of new ideas.