Research On The Game Of Double Discourse Space

Double discourse space is an important phenomenon in the process of socialtransformation. Reform and opening up is an important reason for the birth of thisphenomenon, specifically: the reform and open policy provides existing space for dualdiscourse space; provides class based changes in social class; a variety of socialthoughts in the ideological weapon; the development of modern science andtechnology provides a means of communication for the double discourse space.After more than30years of development, the present status of the doublediscourse space of game is that the official discourse space still occupy theoverwhelming superiority; Folk discourse space shows strong vitality; Thegovernment allows the existence of folk discourse space, at the same time to maintaina high level of control.Double discourse space game emerged many problems, such as the lack ofcredibility of official discourse space, folk discourse space lack of rational doublediscourse space, lack of effective communication. In order to improve the game bothsides intensified, need to improve the credibility of official discourse space, improvethe folk discourse space rational, effective communication to strengthen doublediscourse space.Double discourse space game face three future： Go lay the groundwork forfuture is unlikely to history；Gradually deepened reform, the game both sides in thedirection of the benign interaction development, this kind of practical future；Construction of public discourse space is too far away, only suitable for as a referenceto the target.To explain the dual space of discourse from a new perspective of authority,political and economic reform inconsistency is the game, at the same time, the newauthority to occupy the monopoly position, it is difficult to automatically give way,which makes both sides fall into dilemma, gradually deepen reform become realisticpossible future. New authoritarianism is the goal of democratic politics, thecommunication system will be the equal communication of various discourse space,but the theoretical weakness heralded the road to that goal is tortuous.