Explorations On Papers Coauthorships In Domestic High-level Provincial Agricultural Research Institutes

Collaborative research represented by thesis co-authorship is an important form of cooperation among scholars.The co-authorship of the thesis includes not only cooperation among scholars at the microscopic level,but also inter-agency cooperation at the meso-level.At the level of international cooperation,and from the starting point of the research on co-authorship,there are co-authored researches in the disciplines or in some fields,as well as co-authored researches from institutions,and co-authored studies from the authors.However,regardless of the angle of the research,the purpose of this paper is to analyze the status quo of the co-authors through the analysis of the status quo of the co-authors.Understand the status quo and make suggestions for better future development.This article will take the plant and animal science disciplines as the starting point,and study the thesis co-authored by the 4 provincial-level agricultural institutes that have higher levels in the plant and animal science disciplines,that is,the top 1%of ESI.Firstly,through the literature analysis method,the development status of the four provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences including subject productivity,subject influence,and discipline development power is analyzed to understand the current status of its own development;secondly,through statistics and analysis,three countries,regions and agencies Dimensions were analyzed from a multi-angle essay to understand the differences in thesis co-authorships of 4 high-level provincial agricultural academies;finally,129 were integrated through integration of 4 provincial academies of agricultural institutes through social network analysis.The co-authored institutions analyzed the co-authored networks formed by these 129 co-authoring agencies to understand the characteristics of their co-authored networks,and represented them from the four provincial-level agricultural institutes and 129 co-authorized institutions nationwide and globally.Three dimensions of research hotspots and comparative analysis based on co-word network indicators.Through the multi-analysis of different analytical methods,we can better understand the status of co-authors of high-level provincial agricultural science institutes in China.4 The development of the provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences has a strong momentum of development and the highest quality of thesis,and Zhejiang Provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences is relatively high,but in recent years,the pace of development has declined significantly.Although the number of documents issued by the Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences is high,the quality of issued documents needs to be improved.Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences ranks both in terms of the number of issued documents and the quality of published documents.Afterwards,compared with the other three schools,the disadvantages are obvious;in terms of co-occurrence,the remaining hospitals with the highest degree of internationalization in Beijing Institute are slightly insufficient,while in the co-regional area,the eeastern region has the largest advantage,followed by the North China region.The influence of other regions was relatively small.The associations of agricultural science institutes with top agricultural universities in provinces and cities were significantly associated with each other,and the cooperating network formed by 129 co-authored institutions had remarkable regional consistency.The eastern and northern regions had obvious advantages;The co-word network of four provincial academies of agricultural sciences shows that the research hotspots are basically consistent with the research hotspots in the country,and are in line with the global research hotspots compared with the national This is also due to the development characteristics of China and between regions,that is,Chinese national conditions as a large agricultural country and the geographical location of the provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences,while the index of the co-word network is due to the different sample sizes of the three levels.The network indicators of the co-words of the provincial Academy of Agricultural Sciences all fluctuate,while the national co-word network indicators show a positive growth trend,while the global co-word network has small fluctuations and development due to the large sample size to be more stable.