Men’s Tennis Forehand Volley Selection Of Endurance Training Methods And Empirical

The development of modern men’s tennis technology tends to be refined and comprehensive,and the base style plays the main role in the competition.In the fierce confrontation,the tennis players frequently switch offense and defense,resulting in a large number of pictures in the match.In this case,to win the game,the demand for the ball requires not only good stability but also the speed of the ball.Therefore,this article key point,hitting the stability and speed of the proposed the notion that the explosive endurance find increase explosive endurance training means,for men’s tennis forehand volley endurance training experiment,the problem of improving forehand volley endurance.Through the literature material method,expert interview method,questionnaire survey research methods,such as improve tennis forehand shots explosive endurance training means,take the experiment verify the training methods to improve the effect of explosive force endurance.Determine the experiment of the independent variable and dependent variable,that is,to improve men’s tennis forehand shots explosive endurance training means index and verify the training methods to improve the bottom line in men’s tennis forehand shot the effect of explosive force endurance index.The 32 players are divided into experimental group and control group,ensure the experiment in the first two groups of the basic indicators do not have significant difference,use independent sample t-test and paired sample T test on the basis of two groups of athletes body index,forehand evaluating indicators such as speed,success rate and stroke differences between before and after the experiment data statistical analysis.By analyzing the results of the experiment,the following conclusion:1.Through the literature material,expert interview and questionnaire survey method to find a relatively reasonable men’s tennis hitting power endurance training method and training means training effect evaluation indicators.2.The experimental group was better than the control group in the success rate,average speed and the stroke technique.3.The experimental group was better than the control group’s conventional training method in the form of the explosive resistance training method.