Clinical Study Of Cervical Headache With The Cervical Pulling Method

Objective:Discussion the clinical efficacy, which Cervical pulling method treat the Cervical headache.Methods:In the present study, with the simple randomized control method, with the cases of Cervical headache, the Cervical pulling method were applied and the short-term therapeutic efficacy and the correlated parameters were observed. With the VAS scoring as the assessment of immediate therapeutic efficacy and the foot diseases efficacy standards as the evaluation of short-term therapeutic effects, with the simple randomized controlled methods, the clinical therapeutic efficacy of continuously4treatments of point-pressing manipulation treating acute ankle injury were observed, which provided the basis of scientific and standardized methods of manipulations for the clinical treatment of acute ankle injury.Results:1. Two cases of general information including gender, age, duration and VAS before treatment cases, ROM score difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05), two groups of patients before treatment baseline basically the same.2. There were30cases in the point-pressing manipulation group. After the treatments,7were cured,15were obviously effective,8were effective,0was ineffective, with the total effective rate as100%. In the traditional manipulation group, after the treatments,4were cured,12were apparently effective,7were effective,7was ineffective, with the total effective rate as76.7%. The two groups in the overall effective rate in the treatment group significantly. 3. In contrast to the analgesic effect of both, the treatment effect is more obvious groupConelusion:1. Both the study group and the control group have the remarkable therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of acute ankle injury.2. Compared with the traditional manipulation, point-pressing manipulation was more effective and simple in the treatments of acute ankle injury, which is worthy of being further popularized in clinic.