| Based on the context of current Chinese higher education,in order to establish theunivercity of finance and economics specialty evaluation model as a main line,andrelated domestic as well as foreign research materials,using various mathematicmethods and statistical software, this paper use the key univercity specialty ealutionmodel as the example aims to establish a assessment model which contains a set ofevaluation index with certain weight for major appraisal. And utilizing the result ofthat evaluation to analyze the academic major set-up situation in that university aswell as giving some advices to the univercity of finance and economics for theirfuture development. The contents of this paper are as following:1.Comparison between domestic and foreign major evaluation systemsIn this paper we analyze and prove the domestic current major evaluation system,and then retrospectively, compare them with those of foreign countries in terms ofconcepts as well as mechanisms, including USA, UK, Finland, and etc.2.Introduction to mathematic methodsWe study various mathematic methods used in major evaluation of highereducational schools, and the important ones of which are clearly demonstrated in thispaper to provide us some ways for the research work related to major evaluationmodel with index weight.3.The establishment of major evaluation systemIn this paper,first of all, we exert Literature Reference Method, ExpertBrainstorming Method, Fishbone Analysis Method etc., to gain major-related index,and then measure the results above by Delphi Questionnaire Statistics and SPSSReliability Test to sift out the relevant first and second-class indexes. When it comesto the selection of weight, we use the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) algorithm toinitially calculate and confirm,and subsequently test the weights of indexes and theevaluation system by measures of Expert Scoring, fuzzy mathematics as well asFactor Analysis in SPSS software to obtain a reasonable model.4. To evaluate the major set-up situation of the university of finance andeconomicsBy means of the major-evaluation system this paper has obtained, combiningwith the realistic data, we seek to assess14majors of some key university in terms oftheir merits and demerits as an application, thus conclude eventually and provide theprofessional construction for the univercity of finance and economics.This paper is a brave attempt to an overall analysis of major system building insome university of finance and economics, which has great positive impact on thedevelopment for that university regarded as a breeding ground for potential elites inthe future. |