An Empirical Study On The Functions Of People's Courts From The Perspective Of Rural Governanc

To revitalize the country,the countryside must revitalize.The grand strategy of rural revitalization to stay relevant with the changing times,it is imperative to explore and devise a novel rural governance model.In this new era,the establishment of efficient rural governance systems and mechanisms is contingent upon the presence of Dispatched People’s Tribunal in the rural areas.This paper delves into the role played by Dispatched People’s Tribunal in the rural governance system,with a focus on its unique significance in light of the macro background of comprehensive promotion of the rural revitalization strategy and the ongoing reform of the rural governance model.The study utilizes a combination of field research and literature review to provide a comprehensive analysis.From the rural governance system and the people’s court system.The paper examines the contribution of Dispatched People’s Tribunal in rural governance through three primary functions: litigation source governance,dispute resolution,and legal service.By analyzing the practical application of people’s court in rural governance,the study also sheds light on the existing issues and the underlying reasons for them.Furthermore,the paper explores possible solutions to enhance the rural governance functions of Dispatched People’s Tribunal.In addition to the introduction and conclusion,this study is organized into four primary sections:Part One: Analyze the people’s court system from the perspective of rural governance.This section first outlines rural governance,clarifying the connotation of the rural governance concept and the evolution and development of rural governance models,and analyzing the internal logic and necessity of the rural governance model transformation.It also provides an overview of the people’s court system,elaborating on the historical evolution of the people’s court system and defining the three functions played by the people’s courts in participating in rural governance.Part Two: Conduct a reality check on the three functions of the people’s courts in participating in rural governance,using Y County People’s Court in Yunnan Province as a research sample.This section mainly introduces the general situation of Y County in Yunnan Province and Y County People’s Court,and elaborates on the current situation of the institutional construction of Y County People’s Court and the operation status of the three functions involved in rural governance based on the author’s field research.Part Three: Summarize and analyze a series of problems and causes that have emerged in the practice of the people’s courts participating in rural governance as a research sample.Based on empirical research,this section dissects a series of problems faced by the three functions played by the people’s courts in participating in rural governance: issues that hinder the normal functioning of the litigation source management function of the people’s courts,including the influence of local inherent concepts on case mediation,the formalization of mediation work,and bias in mediation results;issues that affect the normal functioning of the dispute resolution function of the people’s courts,such as imbalance between litigation and litigation source management,and excessive case complexity;issues that constrain the normal functioning of the legal services function of the people’s courts,such as the increasing alienation of the relationship between officials and the masses,the dilution of the masses’ legal consciousness,and the homogenization of the ways in which the people’s courts carry out legal activities.Based on these problems,the causes are analyzed in depth.Part Four: By analyzing and summarizing the problems and causes of the three functions of the people’s court participating in rural governance in practice,and combining the theoretical context of comprehensively advancing the rule of law and revitalizing the countryside in China,this paper proposes feasible countermeasures and suggestions to solve the problems.First,guide rural people to build a legal concept,actively change work concepts,and organically integrate diverse justice perspectives as feasible measures to improve litigation source management function;Second,establish a system of internal and external dispute resolution resources and enhance the construction of case classification and diversion system as the path to improve dispute resolution function;Third,fully utilize the "legal guidance" power of the people’s courts and establish a sound and long-term mechanism for the participation of people’s courts in rural collaborative governance to improve legal services function.