Research On The Primary People’s Court Of YueQing City Of Zhejiang Province Source Of Litigation Management

With the reform and opening up and economic development,all kinds of contradictions and disputes continue to grow,and a large number of people resort to the courts to enter the judicial proceedings.The phenomenon of "litigation explosion" has objectively appeared and has an obvious aggravating trend.Especially after the court fully implemented the case filing and registration system in recent years,the number of cases received by the court has always been in a high running state,and most grass-roots people’s courts are facing more acute contradictions between people and cases.In this context,in order to alleviate the contradiction between people and cases in the court system,the pressure of post judges to handle cases,and release valuable judicial resources,while accelerating the pace of case handling,the court pays more attention to diversified solutions and preventing all kinds of contradictions and disputes,and focuses on preventing the emergence and derivation of litigation from the source.So far,the concept of court litigation source governance has taken shape and entered the practical level.The so-called litigation source governance mainly refers to controlling contradictions and disputes at the source through various means such as litigation mediation connection,so as to prevent and resolve contradictions and disputes from forming litigation cases into the court.Generally speaking,the governance of litigation sources includes at least three requirements: one is to prevent contradictions and disputes,the other is to avoid contradictions and disputes from forming litigation cases into the court,and the third is to mediate litigation cases by means of multiple dispute resolution.In January 2019,the sixth meeting of the Central Committee for comprehensively deepening reform deliberated and adopted the opinions on the implementation of comprehensively deepening reform in the field of politics and law,which provided institutional support for the court to promote the governance of litigation sources.As a result,the courts in many places began to accelerate the governance of litigation sources,and the governance of litigation sources has gradually become the key work of many courts.The author makes an empirical analysis on the litigation source governance of Yueqing people’s court,takes the practice and effectiveness data samples of its litigation source governance as the research basis,takes a point to area view of the experience,the governance of litigation sources has played a positive role in easing the conflicts between individuals and cases in courts,improving the quality of court cases,serving grassroots social governance,and promoting social harmony and stability.Mainly,significant progress has been made in reducing disputes through party and government assessments,strengthening social governance to avoid disputes from expanding,focusing on key areas to resolve stakeholder disputes,and controlling derivative disputes based on litigation advantages.However,at the same time,due to a series of reasons such as a lack of top-level design of the system,strong legislative support,insufficient internal driving force of the court,and a lack of active external coordination,many courts still face confusion and deviation in practice,such as difficulty in resolving external litigation diversion,lagging construction of dispute resolution platforms,and lack of guarantee for dispute resolution mechanisms.At the same time,by applying public management theories such as the New Public Management Theory,Public Goods Theory,and Public Choice Theory,the author further improves the litigation source governance system of the People’s Court of Yueqing City from the perspectives of constructing a general pattern of litigation source governance led by the Party Committee,reconstructing the "non litigation+litigation" dispute resolution system,and improving the progressive hierarchical filtering system of contradictions and disputes.From a micro and specific perspective,the author grasps and examines the system Looking forward to the optimization path of litigation source governance in the future.