| Since the 18th Party Congress,the Party and the government have paid more and more attention to the service function of grassroots party organizations and put forward the goal orientation of party building leading community development.Communist Party members,as subjects of action,need to participate in community governance,which includes public services.Effective cooperative production requires residents’ participation,and communist party members are the bridge between grassroots party organizations and community residents,and through the resources and capabilities they possess,they can drive residents to participate in cooperative production.Based on the empirical investigation of CL communities in Shanghai,this study introduces community action contexts based on Parsons’ social action theory,and classifies community action contexts into four types: emergency management under administrative domination,normal management under administrative domination,emergency management under multiple co-governance,and normal management under multiple co-governance.It also specifically corresponds to the four contexts of CL communities: epidemic prevention and control,waste classification,community conflict,and micro-transformation.From the role theory,the article crystallizes party membership into four indicators: party membership norms,role perceptions,functional expectations and party behavior,and decomposes the co-production process into rule-making,issue setting,resource allocation and action strategies,and compares the party membership and co-production in the four action contexts to sort out the influence of "party membership" on The article attempts to reveal the political identity of Communist Party members.The article attempts to reveal the suitability of the political mobilization of Communist Party members and the spontaneous mobilization of Communist Party members,and how Communist Party members can engage residents in different action contexts to more effectively contribute to community coproduction and provide localized and effective governance strategies for the construction of China’s public service system and service-oriented government. |