In the process of urbanization in our country,the village-to-residential community is accompanied by the changes of the mandatory system,and the number of such communities is also increasing.This type of community is different from the urban community in the ordinary sense.Its population is highly mobile,highly heterogene-ous,and the relationship between residents is relatively estranged,which makes the emotional connection between community residents weak,and the cultivation of social capital is slow.The sense of identity and belonging of the community is also far lower than that of the urban community in the general sense.From the perspective of the current supply model of public goods and services in urban communities in my country,it mainly includes the unified model of the government’s "all-in-one package",the market-oriented model of service outsourcing,and the supply model of multi-subject participation.However,in the actual operation process,the problem of failure of various modes occurs frequently,and the disadvantages of different modes are also increasingly apparent.In order to solve various failure problems,the cooperative production model came into being.This paper takes the example of "flower box adoption" as the research object of the two village-to-residence communities.In the process of field research and interviews,the author collected a large amount of first-hand data,and found that all parties choose whether to participate in the "flower box adoption".The cooperative production of "box adoption" is a behavior of collective choice,and the process of"flower box adoption" is essentially a process of collective action.There are multiple dilemmas such as collective behavior and collective choice,each subject’s awareness of cooperation,ability and execution.hinder the progress of collective action.Therefore,the research question of this paper is:Why is it difficult to implement the cooperative production of public goods in the village reforming community?How to solve this collective action dilemma?After determining the "flower box adoption" of two village-to-residential communities under the jurisdiction of G Street in S City as the research case,in view of the fact that the case study of the cooperative production of public goods in the village-to-residential community is still relatively scarce in my country and the relevant data is scarce,this paper It is believed that the qualitative analysis method can more deeply analyze the internal mechanism of the cooperative production operation mechanism of the public goods in the village reform,so the qualitative analysis method is chosen.In addition,in order to meet the research needs of this paper,this paper mainly selects four methods:field research,participatory observation,structured interview method and open interview in the aspect of data collection and arrangement.From the perspective of the construction of the analytical framework,in the case studied in this paper,the existence of multiple obstacles has led to the existence of free-riding behavior among residents,the emergence of collective choice dilemma,and the problem of alternative implementation.Multiple factors such as the special field of the village reform,the cognitive differences of the participants,and the irregular behavior in the implementation process are complex and intertwined.In view of this,this paper attempts to start from the logical starting point of collective action,along the two main logical lines of subjective and objective,to construct an analytical framework for the cooperative production of community public goods in village reform,and to combine the cooperative production theory and meta-governance theory to try to decipher community public goods.The collective action dilemma in product co-production.Combined with the analytical framework established in this paper,the study finds that the implementation of the cooperative production project of "flower box adoption" in such communities mainly has the following difficulties:First,most of the residents are migrant workers,which are highly mobile and heterogeneous.The social capital of the community is large,and the social capital of the community is weak,and the demand for environmental public products is not urgent(found by field investigation and visit),which greatly reduces the enthusiasm of residents to participate.For the street,during the implementation process of the project,the preliminary investigation of the street was not in-depth enough,and the problems that may arise in the future were not fully pre-set.After purchasing the flower box,the flower box was handed over to the community workstation.The whole process is scientific.To be considered;for community workstations,its daily work is complicated.For the tasks assigned by the streets,they often play a passive role in execution.Coupled with the limitation of objective conditions such as personnel and funds,the enthusiasm for execution is relatively low.Second,from the perspective of the awareness ability and execution of each subject’s participation,residents have insufficient understanding of cooperative production,and are accustomed to the role of a single public service recipient in the past,with large cognitive differences,poor cooperation awareness,and uneven cooperation ability.Inconsistent,there are flexible execution behaviors in the process of cooperative execution.Combined with the analytical framework and theoretical tools used in this paper,the above multiple dilemmas are analyzed,and the main obstacles are as follows:first,the uniqueness of the organizational network in the field of village reform;second,the cognitive differences of each subject of cooperative production;third,the irregularity in the process of cooperative production;fourth,the lack of a guarantee mechanism for cooperative production.On the basis of analyzing the characterization of the dilemma and mining its causes,this paper also attempts to propose a possible path to solve the cooperative production dilemma:first,build a cooperative production community based on the connection of interests.Second,to enhance the participation ability and cultivate trust capital to improve the participation level of each subject.Third,to play the leading role of the government’s "meta-governance",improve the degree of democracy in decision-making,and maintain the consistency of supply and demand to standardize the cooperative production process.Fourth,establish a consultation mechanism,improve the incentive mechanism,and build a monitoring and evaluation system to improve the institutional guarantee mechanism for cooperative production. |