The main reason is that there are a large number of near-synonyms in Chinese,and due to various subjective and objective reasons,students do not have the ability to understand the subtle differences between these near-synonyms,so that the errors that occur gradually "fossilize" in the process of using them.The errors that occur are gradually "fossilized" in the process of use."In the process of investigation and research,with the help of the Modern Chinese Corpus of Peking University,I found that the semantic differences of these near-synonyms are mainly reflected in the semantic The differences in the semantic meaning of these words are mainly reflected in their semantic weight,semantic applicability and emotional color,and the differences in their pragmatic use are mainly reflected in their role as predicates and predicative centers,their modification by adverbs and their choice of objects.The author analyzed this group of near-synonyms through the biased corpus collected in the course of the internship,so as to arrive at the main reasons for the bias.Based on the results of the above study,the author focuses on the group of " indulge "," immerse "," indulge. |