| Targeted poverty alleviation refers to the method of poverty governance by using scientific and effective means,reasonable process of industrial restructuring,accurate identification,accurate assistance and accurate management in accordance with different poverty-stricken regional environments and different poverty-stricken peasant households.For traditional villages,targeted poverty alleviation must be closely combined with the characteristics of traditional villages,and fully highlight the protection and application of high-quality resources and beautiful natural environment in traditional villages.Its implementation content and path must be closely linked to the improvement of landscape vitality.This paper takes the three traditional villages of Manao village,Longtan village and Pingshunba village as the research objects.On the basis of respecting the landscape status quo and combining with field research,it sorts out the influencing factors and coupling characteristics of the targeted poverty alleviation policy and the improvement of the landscape vitality of traditional villages.The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process are used to determine the evaluation index system and weight of the landscape vitality of tourism-oriented traditional villages.The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the landscape vitality of each village,which is of great significance to explore the tourism development strategy of traditional villages and the sustainable development of traditional villages in the context of targeted poverty alleviation.The results show that:(1)In the context of targeted poverty alleviation,Manao village,Longtan village and Pingshunba village have successively focused on the development of tourism industry as a new economic growth point of traditional villages,and carried out rural tourism with the help of traditional village ethnic minority culture,long historical witnesses,traditional village buildings with solitary characteristics and superior ecological and natural landscape.The specific manifestations are as follows,1st,the current situation of poverty alleviation: the poverty alleviation of the whole village has been basically realized,and the poverty alleviation methods are mainly industrial poverty alleviation,cultural poverty alleviation and living environment poverty alleviation.2nd,tourism status: the three traditional villages have profound cultural heritage and basic conditions for tourism,but the village aging,basic service facilities,landscape space design is still insufficient,and the supply of tourism products is insufficient.3rd,landscape status: plant landscape is rich,lack of fine design landscape space,the landscape style is difficult to meet the needs of tourism.4th,landscape vitality: Longtan village,Manao village,Pingshunba village landscape space vitality is insufficient,need to further enhance the landscape vitality.(2)Through the study of the status quo characteristics of the three traditional villages,namely,Manao village,Longtan village and Pingshunba village,it is concluded that the improvement of landscape vitality and targeted poverty alleviation have achieved the coupling of policy,content and purpose.Combined with the advantages and disadvantages of the landscape space of the three case villages,as well as the investigation of the layout characteristics,cultural characteristics and realistic conditions of tourism development of the villages,it is concluded that the main influencing factors of landscape vitality improvement and precision poverty alleviation are as follows : plant diversity,convenience facilities,leisure facilities,spatial accessibility,land mix,night lighting,spatial security,folk culture,cultural activities,artistic aesthetics,service population density,plant health,plant color richness,plant landscape comfort,artistic aesthetics and spatial scale.(3)Tourism traditional village landscape vitality index system is divided into two levels,five indicators,respectively Location vitality(0.3332)(weight in parentheses,the same below),spatial vitality(0.1914),facility vitality(0.0692),cultural vitality(0.1536),natural vitality(0.2525).There are 15 secondary indices,including service population density(0.1798),plant health(0.1333),space security(0.1176),leisure facilities(0.0081),convenience facilities(0.0186),art aesthetic(0.0215)weight is low.In the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results,Longtan village(0.901)scored higher in landscape location vitality,Pingshunba village(0.846)ranked middle,and Manao village(0.766)scored lower.In terms of landscape spatial vitality,Longtan village(0.671)scored higher,Manao village(0.568)ranked middle,and Pingshunba village(0.516)scored lower.In terms of the vitality of landscape facilities,Longtan village(0.242)is the highest,followed by Manao village(0.215),and Pingshunba village(0.205)is the lowest.In terms of the vitality of landscape culture,Longtan village(0.675)is the highest,Pingshunba village(0.533)is the middle,and Manao village(0.512)is the lowest.The natural landscape vitality of Manao village(1.094)was higher,Longtan village(0.975)was middle,and Pingshunba Village(0.758)was lower.The overall vitality evaluation of the village was higher in Longtan Village(3.464),and Manao village(3.155)ranked middle,and Pingshunba village(2.858)scored lower.On the whole,the landscape vitality of Longtan village is better,Manao village is general,and Pingshunba village is poor.(4)By summarizing the problems found in the investigation of the status quo of Manao village,Longtan village and Pingshunba village,and combining with the results of the evaluation system of the landscape vitality of tourism-based traditional villages,five strategies are put forward to improve the landscape vitality of tourism-based traditional villages:(1)improve the accessibility of landscape space;(2)improvement of facilities;(3)Prominent original ecological integration;(4)Reflect spatial affinity;(5)Enhancing audience participation. |
PDF Full Text Request