Evaluation Of Geological Remains Resources Of Laojunshan National Geopark

At present, China has devoted a lot of energy to the declaration and construction of the National Geological Park, but the basic research on the investigation and evaluation of geological relics resources is not yet ripe.In the evaluation of Geological Trace resources,it is difficult to reflect the particularity of the Geological Trace resources by quoting the traditional evaluation methods of tourism resources. Geological relic resources investigation and evaluation of geological park planning and construction of a reasonable premise and the core,how to scientifically select evaluation factors and establish a reasonable evaluation index system determines the ultimate resource evaluation results can accord with the actual situation of the geological park.With the particularity of geological relic resources as a starting point, combining qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation methods and evaluation of the comprehensive evaluation model of construction,will take a very important theoretical significance and reference value to the development and planning of future national geological park,can provide comprehensive scientific basis for the development and protection.This paper selects the Geological Trace resources,set ornamental value, scientific value,tourism value in a Laojun Mountain National Geological Park as a sample research area.The field investigation of geological relic resources of Laojun Mountain National Geological Park is carried out, and according to the specific situation of the geological park, the target system is adjusted and perfected.Respectively, using the qualitative evaluation method, AHP analysis hierarchy process(AHP), the comprehensive scoring method three evaluation methods of geological relic resources evaluation and empirical research, to verify the evaluation method is scientific and reasonable.Come to the following conclusions:(1) Qualitative evaluation method, there is no need to establish mathematical model, the method is simple and easy, but there are the following problems: ①Evaluation results and evaluation work experience related with strong, leading to the individual differences are significant;②Evaluate the mood and feelings directly affect the level of evaluation of geological heritage resources; ③Evaluation process has strong subjectivity. As a result, it is the possibility of significant differences exist.(2) Using the analytic hierarchy process(AHP), the results of the Laojun Mountain national geological relic resources are obtained.. Expert group, group management, tour groups, tourists group, the evaluation of geological relic resources in Laojun Mountain overall are respectively: 78.6,78.657, 77.029, 78.057, refer to tourist resources classification, investigation and evaluation of geological relic resources grade division standard, the overall ranking of Laojunshan National Geopark geological heritage resources for three level, that the provincial geological heritage resources. The evaluation results are very close to national geological heritage resources. Secondly, in the Laojunshan National Geological Park selected 51 were quantitatively evaluated with representative geological heritage attractions, results and evaluation to achieve 23.53% for the national, provincial 49.02%, municipal accounting for 19.61%, county level at least, accounting for 7.84%. At last, evaluating the mean scores for 71.92 points, indicating that the Laojunshan individual geological heritage resources is very prominent, has achieved the national geological relic resources evaluation standard, overall average score reached standard of provincial geological relic resources, high value of geological relic resources and excellent grades, mainly for extremely high ornamental value and significant scientific value, but the influence of resource shortage, Geopark development conditions poor. Empirical studies show that by analytic hierarchy process(AHP) to establish evaluation index system, the results and Laojunshan Geopark consistent with actual situation, the applicability and validity of the method is verified.(3) Using the comprehensive evaluation method, through the expert scoring, on Laojunshan national geological heritage resources of the comprehensive evaluation, the final evaluation score for 74.63 and with reference to the level of Geological Park in Working guide for National Geological Park in China, Laojun Mountain belongs to the second class national geological park. The results show that the Laojun Using the comprehensive evaluation method, through the expert scoring, on Laojunshan national geological heritage resources of the comprehensive evaluation, the final evaluation score for 74.63 and with reference to “the level of Geological Park in the Chinese National Geological Park Guide”, Laojun Mountain belongs to the second class national geological park. The results show that the Laojunshan National Geopark geological heritage resources evaluation results accord well with the actual situation, using the integrated score of Geopark geological heritage resources of evaluation method is scientific and feasible. The method can be popularly used in National Geopark geological heritage evaluation.