The Inside Game Of Journalism Club

A total of214papers to get the China News Award in2002-2012, what it is? Whether it represents a higher level of academic fields at that time? Through the paper selection, the China News Award is to assume its role as the highest national awards and mission? Known as industry and academia in the points of the press, the award for both kind of collusion can play a unique role? This article prepare to answer these questions.China News Prize is journalism’s highest official awards.The paper with news, reviews, and the same as a regular item China News Award judges since2002. The project is set up and selection to" review the results of the exchange of news theory and then better guide the practice of journalism". As a product of the national will and professional norms interactive two dimensions,the selection can not only part of the thesis project presents the basic conditions of academic production, and also an important impact on the development of the academic news media. So i select this as a research object, and thus leads to the question to be answered in this article.This paper argues that the project should be able to represent the calendar year winning "news theory ", as well as their thesis project aims and objectives, so as to complete its guidance on the news practice. At the same time, to play its leading and exemplary role of journalism people. Therefore, this paper first constructed from multiple dimensions topic, research methods, citation, author, former category contained units, from the overall analysis of the award-winning thesis, thus rendering and winning paper outlines the basic look. Secondly, we select some representative winning paper, its interpretation of the case, and with the academic calendar China News hot spot comparing, trying to work through a specific description to the contrary, the overall condition of the award-winning thesis. By studying these two aspects, thus panoramic display of the basic situation of China News Prize winning paper, exploratory existential status of the award. Finally, we borrowed the concept of academic community", in full understanding of the basis of the thesis project of Practice" on exploring the "ought." Of course, as one of many projects China News Award, selected papers comply with its overall objectives and the relevant provisions. Therefore, this paper describes the award-winning thesis, but also to inspect their system. From the institutional level trying to find the current thesis project presents reasons for this situation, and to explore the road of reform.Through these studies, we find that, the China News Award thesis project selection is limited to the industry, the results of vote, it is difficult to complete their own purposes. First, all the winning papers are basically the study of the news business; Second, the method level, very few quantitative studies using other non-quantitative research, it is difficult to incorporate aspects of qualitative research, more akin to " personal feelings." Third, most of the papers have no citations. Fourth, the basic focus of the winners in the industry, but mostly people with senior positions in the industry, too single. Fifth, focus on winning papers from some journals, mainly in industry journals, research journals have less paper award. Sixth, there are many aspects of the system set up enough winning chance distribution is extremely uneven. Seventh, the winning papers do not have a high level, on the one hand, their concerns immediately changes the hot current events, on the other hand, from the perspective of academic norms, the existence of many problems. In short, compared to a high standard selection reason China News Award, and the thesis project, I believe this project to its proper level far in urgent need of reform.Therefore, we propose to perfect the project both from the institutional level and the philosophy of the vote, which is committed to building the academic community, collusion between industry and academia to promote both communication and dialogue, so as to promote the further development of the news of academic research.Compared to similar studies, this paper winning papers as the research object, its full three-dimensional depiction, and from the perspective of industry and academia to bridge the differences, and to explore its ’ought’, with some innovation.