Game Analysis Of Knowledge Sharing In Virtual Academic Community

In modern scientific research, academic exchanges are an important part of researchers work, it is engaged in research activities important elements, Is an important condition for the promotion of academic development and technological innovation. But with the abilities and needs of researchers continuously improve, traditional academic modes of communication potentially limit access to information in academic exchanges and exchanges width, with the advent of internet technology and development, more researchers began turning to the Web to make up for the lack of traditional academic exchanges.With the development of Internet technology, the virtual platform for academic exchanges. Internet space has the characteristics of easy to share and strong interaction, the academic thinking so that, under different cultural backgrounds, in the same space style show. In order to promote the exchange of academic research work, to achieve a wider range of knowledge-sharing, improve the efficiency of knowledge innovation for the purpose of research on the construction virtual academic community, knowledge sharing is not smooth, did not reach the expected effect. The Essence of this solution to this problem is encourage knowledge sharing behavior carried out by members of the academic community.This article From the study virtual academic community knowledge sharing pattern, From the perspective of game theory, research virtual academic community members face knowledge sharing mechanism adopted different strategies, Mechanisms and methods to solve problems.On the basis of analysis of existing research results and problems, the use of game theory analysis methods, virtual academic community members in different contexts adopted different strategies in the face of the knowledge-sharing behavior analysis of the reasons. To select of wooden worm Community as specific cases, Carried out research targeted.On this basis, a virtual community of knowledge sharing to achieve several key issues:Firstly,define the concept of virtual academic community with members of, can be drawn from the literature after the study, current research has focused on virtual communities, relatively little research on virtual academic community. For the definition of virtual academic community is different scholars from different angles interpretation, there is no unanimously approved the formation of academic results. Classification and characteristics of the members of the academic community, also has a different point of view. These basic questions on the follow-up study of the virtual academic community has an important significanceSecondly, virtual academic community knowledge sharing behavior is a lack of trust mechanism, In the use of game theory in four different conditions for the next game model for the analysis of the game between the gains made in the virtual academic community members can be drawn from members participate in the knowledge shared, often unable to determine the probability of their knowledge sharing, making it difficult to have a stable income is expected to reduce the knowledge sharing. Therefore, the trust mechanism for virtual academic community building is a very important part of it.Thirdly, inadequate incentives in the virtual academic community, found in the study of knowledge sharing in virtual academic community, many scholars have put forward relevant recommendations incentive mechanism, but have not gone into how to achieve the incentives of the extension and content. In this paper, selected wooden insect communities expand case studies, evaluation and incentive incentives combined with the actual situation. Build a reputation through the evaluation model, by shared virtual incentives to improve motivation.Finally, post adverse selection and moral hazard problems. Virtual academic community knowledge sharing, information asymmetry is a normal phenomenon. Adverse selection and moral hazard have a negative impact on academic exchange activities. This angle is not concerned about the results based on game theory perspective of virtual academic community knowledge sharing.