Dredging-Wind-and-Dispersing-Lung Method Primarily Dialectical Therapy To Post Infectious Cough And The Impact To It.

Objective:The thesis is based on the traditional Chinese medical (TCM) about the the theory of post infectious cough (PIC),and it discusses the method of Dredging-Wind-and-Dispersing-Lung that may have more advantages than the other methods. The main purpose of this paper are as follows:PIC has become more common in the clinical, but there are no effective methods. The purpose of this text lies in seeking a more useful method of PIC. The specificity diagnostic method about PIC is still lack,so the other purpose is to find a testing effective means.Methods:This thesis actual operation processes are as follows:the case is collected in the outpatient,and will collect about 45cases. The cases will be divided into Chinese medicine group and control group.we will adopt the methods of Dredging-Wind-and-Dispersing-Lung and the modern medicine of cough treatment.We should do some related inspection before treatment,such as Routine blood,X-ray, pulmonary function test and airway resistance,FENO and so on.At the first day, we should know about the patient's symptoms, ask their condition changes and the resoures.At the end of the treatment,we should inspect the related symptoms, ask their condition changes, the resoures,airway resistance,FENO.The databases should be established, and we should analysis the databases.Results:We found that the traditional Chinese medicine group and the control group total effectiveness by statistical analysis P<0.05, and in the asfect of overall efficacy Traditional Chinese medicine group is better than control group.Traditional Chinese medicine in treating PIC is better than control group.In the aspects of cough, two groups in cure rate, significant efficiency, efficient, inefficiency of statistical analysis P<0.05, there is a statistically significant,so in traditional Chinese medicine in treating cough curative is more effective than control group. Both total effectiveness and inefficient by related statistical analysis about sputum P<0.05, we can think that Chinese medicine in treatment of sputum is still better than control.In the aspect of Zrs, traditional Chinese medicine group before and after the treatment is P<0.05, there is difference before and after treatment. The control group before and after treatment is P<0.05,there is still different before and after the treatment. But the two groups after treating is P>0.05, so after treatment, the two groups did not see obvious difference. In the aspect of R5,traditional Chinese medicine group before and after the treatment is P<0.05,it is different before and after treatment, there is a statistically significant.The control group by statistical analysis before and after treatment is P>0.05, there is no differences before and after treatment. In the aspect of R20,traditional Chinese medicine group before and after treatment is P<0.05, there is a statistically significant difference. The control group before and after treatment is P>0.05, there is no difference,so there is no statistical significance. In the aspect of FENO,Before and after treatment Chinese medicine group is P<0.05, control group P>0.05, so the curative effect of Chinese medicine is better than control group.Conclusion:The traditional Chinese medicine in treating cough and sputum is better than the control group. In the aspect of the airway resistance, before and after the treatment of Chinese medicine,Zrs,R5,R20 be improved obviously,and the control group's Zrs has improved.Both groups in X5 changs are not obvious.At the aspect of the FENO curative effect of Chinese medicine is more obvious than control group.