The Research Of Budget Management Of State-owned Assets Of Administrative Institutions

After 9 years of department budget reform, budget distribution and scientific norms have been greatly improved. At present, the impact of the budget department is one of the obstacles to reform state-owned asset management institutions administration reform lagged behind, as well as the cause because of such reform lags behind budget and administration department of state assets and institutions with regard to possession of a combination of many problems, such as: asset allocation standards to carry out enforcement actions, configuration unfair waste of idle assets, the use of inefficient, non-standard disposal of assets, the assets of the loss of more serious information asymmetry occupied assets, budgeting and administration of state assets and institutions in line with possession of assets occupied by the use of non-cost accounting, impact on the scientific nature of budgeting and so on. To resolve the above-mentioned drawbacks, it is necessary to budget for asset management as an important part of management to promote the deepening of the reform of departmental budgets.Administration and institutions of budget management is an important state-owned asset management tools, asset finance department budget is an integral and important budget component of the administration of state-owned assets management institutions and want to adapt the budget model. Research institutions improve administration of the budget of state-owned assets management, both in favor of effective asset management job, but also conducive to deepening the reform of public finance budget management, scientifically draw up budget for the financial sector, with the meaning of theoretical guidance. Research institutions improve administration of the budget of state-owned assets management, the promotion of integrated financial management reforms, help to improve the efficiency of financial allocation of assets and help from the source to prevent and resolve the problem of corruption has important practical significance.This study used a combination of internal and external, empirical research and theoretical research combining qualitative and quantitative analysis of combination of macro analysis and micro-analysis, and comparative analysis of the method of administration of state assets and institutions of budget management issues comprehensively and systematically analyzed.This article is divided into three parts. The first part includes the first and second chapter. First of all, this section outlines the administration and institutions at home and abroad related to state-owned asset management theory; administration made clear the concept of state-owned assets and institutions, classification, characteristics, status and role; an analysis of state-owned asset management institution administration and budget management between the Department relationship.Most of the second third, four chapters. Analysis of this part of the domestic administrative institutions of state-owned assets management of the budget situation, problems and the reasons therefor; analysis and administration of foreign institutions from the state-owned assets and management of budget management experience.Part III is divided into chap. In research and administrative institutions from the state-owned assets management and budget management experience, budget management and administration of state-owned asset management institutions to combine the idea of streamlining the budget management and a combination of asset management management mechanism, the establishment of scientific and rational system of the assets of the department budget, improve the asset allocation criteria and the cost of fixed managed to establish a sound government procurement system to purchase the assets of the main ways to build; establish a perfect compensation for the use and disposal of assets management system, budget constraints, capital gains and gradually incorporated into the budget management ; the establishment of state-owned assets administrative institutions of the dynamic management of information systems.