Research On Public Opinion In The Perspective Of Legal Regulations

The face of the network, this public discourse space, in particular, the network of non-rational development of public opinion, the article tried to regulate the perspective of the law to eliminate the network of public opinion, conflict of laws, and build a network of public opinion, to adjust system in order to ensure proper health, public opinion, and further promote its the democratic process and social progress in the role.Introduction partly explain why the proposed regulatory system from a legal point of view of public opinion research network, introduced this issue at home and abroad for the study of the status quo, as well as the theoretical basis of this study, thesis structure and research methods, seeks to rely on the public domain and network media, freedom of expression and cyberspace, technological progress and related legislation as the theoretical basis of a study.The first chapter from the network related to clarification of the concept of public opinion starting to introduce the historical status of the network of public opinion, the development model and status characteristics of the development process of China's Internet media, as well as some of the problems which, in particular the existing law on the network the lack of effective regulation of public opinion in order to elicit public opinion on network conflict with the law.Chapter II selected a number of sensational cases in recent years, as material as the basis for the reality of the network were introduced in the real world of public opinion and legal forms of conflict, these conflicts involve conflicts with judicial independence, privacy and civil conflict, with the government reputation of the conflict, the conflict with the judicial investigative power, and information release system, a unified conflict.Chapter III of the excavation from the multi-level network of public opinion, the reasons for conflict with the law, drawn from the results of the conflict is the social role of public opinion by the network of dislocation, lack of literacy stakeholders, the network of public opinion and the law conflict over executive power in cyberspace extension of the and network of public opinion behind the economic and political interests, driven by such factors.Chapter IV on network and public opinion on the current legal system to sort out, and its analysis of problems: first, there is no a real sense of public opinion to protect the network of specialized law; Second, the enactment of the primary disorder, standardized object overlap, the legal rank relatively low, mostly under the counterpoint; third, most of them are "against nature" provisions or "voluntary" content exist; fourth, legislation and technological fault; Finally, the network restrictions on public opinion means a lack of transparency and relief .Chapter V of the previous text of the network related theories of public opinion, as well as public opinion in the above-mentioned network of legal regulation of the reality that the legal channels through a simple adjustment of system difficult to establish the network of public opinion, the question arises of building a network of public opinion, three major strategies to adjust the system that the only to clarify and understand the network based on the law of mass media to raise the moral consciousness of the main network of public opinion, namely, media literacy and legal awareness, improve and perfect the legal system and regulations related to the construction of the macro follow the propagation of, adhere to the legal regulation, focusing on Ethical principles of ease in order to have the role of the formation of the adjustment system, and ultimately to be effective protection of personal expression and public debate, and fundamentally to generate public opinion on the network strength of the legal regulation.Finally the conclusion section of the paper was summarized, and once again reaffirmed that the Fifth Chapter of the relevant point of view, pointing out that follows the propagation of the macro, adhere to the legal regulation, focusing on ethical principles and corresponding countermeasures to ease, but also a kind of regulation is a kinds of line with the law, the integrity of the nature of the whole process of consideration.