Clinical Observation On The Effects Of Hypertension In Perimenopausal Women With The Treatment Of Calming And Suppressing The Hyperactive Liver Yang

Objective:1) Observe the effect of calming and suppressing the hyperactivel iver YANQcalm the heart and tranquilizing the mind on the perimenopausal hypertensive women's blood pressure.2) Observing the effect of calming and suppressing the hyperactivel iver YANQcalm the heart and tranquilizing the mind on symptoms improved and the quality of life of the perimenopausal hypertensive women.Methods:Choose in 41-60 years old age, menopausal syndrome (kupperman ratings improved certificate>15 points) and high value with normal blood pressure and high grade 1 female patients 45 cases were randomly divided into 22 cases of control group and 23 cases, including high blood pressure is normal group rank 1 in 8 cases,14 cases hypertension, high blood pressure is normal control group,10 cases, grade 1 13 cases hypertension. In psychological counseling, lifestyle guide and sedative, oryzanol, vitamins and other drugs based on trial, rank 1 hypertension enalaprilats+Songling Xuemaikang capsule oral treatment, normal blood pressure of high value Songling Xuemaikang capsule group, grade 1 capsule hypertension patients with enalaprilats for normal high blood pressure value, will not be antihypertensive therapy.4 weeks for a period. Observe the patient's blood pressure and before and after the treatment of kupperman ratings improvement.Results:1) after treatment group and control group of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, there were dropped by statistically significant difference (P<0.01), Compare two sets of systolic and diastolic blood pressure after treatment, the difference between systolic treatment t-test shows the difference between the two groups (P<0.01)<0.05, better than control group, Diastolic pressure differential treatment by non-parameter test showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05), and controls in lower diastolic pressure effect. The control group and group were normal blood pressure patients and high grade 1 hypertension, showed normal subgroup analysis of high value before and after the treatment group was not statistically different systolic (P>0.05), and normal high value and experimental treatment compared existing systolic statistical differences (P=0.01),1 before and after the treatment group and control group hypertension, systolic contrast significant difference (P<0.01), four subgroups of diastolic blood pressure levels before and after treatment were significant difference (P<0.01). The comparison between groups, grade 1 systolic hypertension treatment group and control group fell difference exists between the statistically significant (P<0.01)< 0.05 three group and control group in no statistically significant differences between (P>0.05).2) before and after the treatment of kupperman ratings improvement of comparative analysis, statistically significant difference (P<0.01). Experimental and control efficacy is statistically significant differences between index (P<0.01), the two groups of efficient existing statistical differences (0.01 (P<0.05). Explain symptoms improved group and control group in which there are in effect, the experimental effect than control group. Results:Currently in clinical cases, no statistics results.Conclusion: Different levels of blood pressure groups in different distribution type certificate. The treatment group and control group, systolic blood pressure drop is better than control group declines, diastolic pressure decline has no obvious difference between the two groups. The treatment group was better than control symptoms improved.