| This dissertation investigates the relevance of two concepts which have been proposed by sociologists of work and occupation to apply to workers' feelings when interacting with technology on the job: alienation and deskilling versus reskilling. A sample of 62 librarians and library assistants was interviewed to assess whether these concepts are applicable to one of today's most "technologized" jobs, that of librarianship.;The results at once confirm as well as reject the model proposed. While it is true that librarians neither feel deskilled or alienated, so do a large number of library assistants. A small group of assistants, however, can be clearly labeled as deskilled and alienated. However, this must be linked to autonomy and control, not simply the notion of technology.;Shortcoming of the present work are delineated, and future research goals outlined. An international focus on the study of technology and occupations is proposed, which should give a more comprehensive understanding on how occupations change with the introduction of sophisticated technology, and how workers experience these changes.;Included in this dissertation are an account of the historical development of the occupation since the founding of the American Library Association, an investigation of its persistent gender segregation, a description of the concepts investigated, as well as a "compensatory model of skill" which rejects a crude, unilinear theory of upgrading or downgrading of skills and ensuing alienation, as proposed by many scholars. |