Intervention Effect Of Functional Training With Different Loads On Upper Chiasma Syndrome In Male College Students

At present,China intends to promote the building of a strong sports country and fully embrace the important role of sports in building a strong socialist modern country.It is proposed that the national strategy of national preparation should be implemented from the aspects of improving the civil service system for national preparation and stimulating the intellectual development of national education.fitness to help build a healthy China.Cell phones and computers are in the constant development of technology have become necessities of life.Poor sitting posture and insufficient exercise lead to the imbalance of chest and back muscles leading to the upper cross syndrome.This paper discusses the pathogenesis of the upper chiasmatic syndrome and the effect of functional training intervention on the treatment of the upper chiasmatic syndrome by means of literature,expert interviews,questionnaires,experiments and mathematical statistics.Through the short-term high-intensity and long-term medium intensity functional training,we can intervene and treat male college students with upper cross syndrome and find a more suitable exercise load.And the data of four and eight weeks of the experiment were analyzed to understand the trend of the effect of functional training intervention on cross syndrome.Experimental results:1.At the end of the experiment,there was a significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).From the overall point of view,The intervention and treatment effects were better in the short-term high-intensity group.2.After the experiment,the two groups compared the intervention effects of head forward,round shoulder,rotation of shoulder-neck range of motion,and shoulder-neck pain index in superior cross syndrome.The short-time high-intensity group was better than the long-time medium-intensity group,with significant differences(P<0.05).Eight weeks after the experiment,there were significant differences in head forward and rotation(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between flexion and extension groups,and lateral flexion of shoulder and neck ROM between the two groups.(P>0.05).Specifically,the difference was significant(P<0.05).The difference was 41.4±14.2 in the short-time high-intensity group and 45.9±10.1 in the long-time medium-intensity group.The round shoulder was 27.9±7.3 in the short time high strength group and 30.0±4.8 in the long time medium strength group,with significant difference(P<0.05).The range of motion of shoulder and neck was 66.7±9.7 in left rotation short time high intensity group and 61.4±10.6 in long time medium intensity group,with significant difference(P<0.05),67.5±11.5 in right rotation short time high intensity group and 63.4±7.6 in long time medium intensity group,with significant difference(P<0.05).The index of shoulder and neck pain was 0.2±0.8 in the short time high intensity group and 0.6±1.4 in the long time medium intensity group,with significant difference(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the flexion,extension and lateral flexion of shoulder and neck ROM between the two groups.(P>0.05).3.Before,during and after the experiment,the intervention and treatment effect of the head tilt,round shoulder,shoulder neck mobility,flexion and extension indexes of the subjects in the short-term high-intensity group began to have a significant difference eight weeks after the experiment(P<0.05),and the intervention and treatment effect continued to rise.The intervention and treatment effects of shoulder and neck flexion,rotation and shoulder and neck pain indexes began to have significant differences four weeks after the experiment(P<0.05),and the intervention and treatment effects continued to rise.4.Before,during and after the experiment,the intervention and treatment effects of head tilt,round shoulder,shoulder neck mobility,flexion and extension of the subjects in the long-term medium intensity group were significantly different from those in the 8 weeks after the experiment(P<0.05),and the intervention and treatment effects continued to rise.The intervention and treatment effects of shoulder and neck flexion,rotation and shoulder and neck pain index began to have significant differences four weeks after the experiment(P<0.05).The shoulder and neck pain index reached the bottleneck eight weeks after the experiment,and was the same as the average number of twelve weeks after the experiment.The intervention and treatment effects of other indicators continued to rise.Research conclusion:1.Before the experiment,the incidence of cross syndrome was investigated among 1218 college students in Yunnan Province.It was found that male students were higher than female students.2.After 12 weeks of functional training,the upper chiasm syndrome of the subjects was improved to varying degrees,and the overall performance was that the short-time high-intensity functional training was better than the long-time moderate-intensity functional training in the treatment of upper chiasm syndrome.3.Comparison of effects between groups Conclusion: The intervention effects of head forward,round shoulder,rotation of shoulder and neck range of motion,The short-term high-intensity shoulder and neck pain group with upper cruciate syndrome was better than the long-term moderate-intensity group.There was no difference between the two groups in shoulder and neck flexion and lateral flexion.4.Comparison of the effects within the short time and high intensity group Conclusion:The intervention effects of subjects’ head forward,round shoulder,shoulder and neck range of motion,flexion and extension indexes began to show significant differences eight weeks after the experiment.The intervention effects of lateral flexion,rotation and shoulder and neck pain indexes of shoulder and neck ROM began to show significant differences four weeks after the experiment.5.Comparison of effects within the long time medium intensity group Conclusion: The intervention effect of subjects’ head forward,round shoulder,shoulder and neck range of motion,flexion and extension indexes showed significant differences eight weeks after the experiment.The intervention effects of lateral flexion,rotation and shoulder and neck pain indexes of shoulder and neck ROM began to show significant differences four weeks after the experiment.