| China is limited to natural conditions and the level of rural economic development,for a long time the scale of villages are relatively small,and the number of established villages is small,the scale is small,the population is small,the input is large,the layout is scattered,and the strength is weak,which seriously restricts the economic and social development of China’s rural areas.Due to the special characteristics of China’s established villages,the public service supply in most rural areas has long shown the characteristics of supply fragmentation,in the case of Sichuan,it can be specifically manifested as the relatively large-scale centralized public service supply in rural areas is less,and the supply of small-scale or scattered public services is more;in February 2020,Sichuan Province issued the "Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Adjustment and Reform of the Village-level Establishment System" on the basis of extensive research and full demonstration to promote the merger of established villages in Sichuan Province.In this context,studying the adjustment and reform of the village-level structure is conducive to further building a modern new urban and rural social form that promotes each other and coexists and integrates,is conducive to increasing the accurate supply of modern rural public services,is conducive to accelerating the overall effective promotion of the modernization project of rural governance mechanism,and is conducive to the promotion and implementation of China’s rural revitalization strategy,which has important practical and theoretical significance.In this paper,Hongya County,Sichuan Province,137 valid farmer questionnaires and5 village-level questionnaires were collected by random sampling and other methods in Jinhuaqiao Community,Yanyuan Village,Tanking Village,Gaomiao Town,Shuixiu Village and Heishan Village in Wawushan Town.On the basis of grasping the current village-level structural adjustment and merger methods and relevant literature research,two typical merger models were condensed,an evaluation index system for the quality of rural public service supply was constructed,and the effectiveness of the village-level structural adjustment and reform was analyzed.The study shows that there are the following three problems in the adjustment and reform of the village-level structure in Hongya County,one is that there are problems at the personnel level such as the reduction of grass-roots service personnel,the increase in service pressure,the lack of public service awareness and service ability of grass-roots personnel,the lack of supervision mechanism for grass-roots service personnel,and the lack of incentive mechanism;Second,there are problems at the capital level such as insufficient financial investment in public services and weak supply capacity of the village collective economy to help public services;Third,at the facility level,there are problems such as the transfer of public service facilities in merged villages,the serious homogenization of rural public service supply,and the lack of follow-up operation and management of rural public service facilities.Therefore,the suggestions of this article have the following three points: First,at the personnel level,we should formulate a structural adjustment plan according to local conditions,reasonably set the number of grass-roots service members,make a good entrance,improve the comprehensive quality and treatment of grass-roots service personnel,and improve the supervision mechanism of grass-roots staff;Second,at the capital level,it is necessary to encourage the participation of multiple subjects,increase the investment of rural public service funds and take multiple measures to enhance the collective economic strength of the village;Third,at the level of facilities,it is necessary to improve the public service guarantee mechanism for the withdrawal and merger of villages according to local conditions,establish a rural public service supply mechanism that is supplied on demand and in different categories,and establish a follow-up operation and management mechanism for rural public service facilities. |