| As an important part of comprehensively deepening the reform,rural land system reform is the top-level design and grassroots exploration of rural reform in the new era.On January 2,2018,the CPC central committee and the state council issued the opinions on the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy: "improve the policy on idle homestead and idle rural housing,and explore the separation of ownership,qualification and use rights of homestead.Pilot projects have been launched in 33 designated regions across the country.The determination of this reform policy has aroused heated discussion from all walks of life.The interpretation and views of the policy from all walks of life differ.The direction of the homestead system reform should be not only discussed in theory,but also rooted in the results of pilot practice.How effective are the pilot regional reforms? What academic viewpoints can be supported by the reform results is a question worth further study.Homestead separation allocation policy is good,there is few scholars from the perspective of peasant household level and benefits to study and carry out empirical research on the effect of articles about land reform is a few,with these problems,this paper selected the only pioneer,long xi county,Gansu province as the sample area,adopt the method of field interviews and questionnaire to obtain data,an empirical study.First of all,on the basis of combing the historical context,policy documents and utilization status of homestead system in China,the author summarizes the policy objectives of this policy.Secondly,through the interview with the person in charge of the homestead system reform in longxi county and the peasant households participating in the implementation of the policy,the author summarizes and summarizes the practice mode of homestead reform and analyzes the practice logic of each mode,so as to verify whether the practice logic of the practice mode matches the national policy goal.Finally,with the help of Amartya Sen's feasible ability theory,the empirical analysis method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method were used to measure the welfare level of rural households participating in the implementation of the policy.Through the research,the following results are obtained:(1)the original intention of the reform of the separation of the three rights of homestead proposed by the state is mainly to activate idle homestead,improve the utilization efficiency of homestead,increase the welfare of farmers,and promote the development of rural areas under the condition that the majority of farmers do not lose their houses.(2)the concrete practice of the Gansu west Gansu mode can be summarized as: "the collective + company + peasant household" mode(idle homestead farmers will temporarily make collective,tourism companies and the collective cooperation and development)of a home stay facility homestead on the entry mode,the homestead double open mode(homestead allow mortgages,loosen the restriction on the mortgagee),land paid out reclamation of cultivated land pattern.(3)The welfare level of farmers participating in the practice has been improved on the whole.The fuzzy evaluation value of the welfare effect of farmers' homestead is 0.579,which is at a relatively high level.Among them,the economic benefit level is 0.601,which has the greatest impact on the overall welfare level.(4)The practice of house land reform in long xi county is concentrated in townships with relatively good economic development,and there are huge spatial differences.The real homestead three rights separation reform has little effect in the practice of the whole region.Long xi county rural homestead,therefore,the exploration of the policy implementation and separation,promote the individual has a location advantage is the increase of income of farm household,in long xi county rural homestead to dominate in the number of remote agricultural land,even if the pilot policy of original legal restrictions,and no "chance" property income gained from the homestead. |
PDF Full Text Request