Index Optimization Research On Performance Evaluation Index Of Government's Purchase Of Sports Public Services

With the improvement of the national basic public service system,the purchase of sports public service by the government is officially promoted nationwide.The promotion of the modernization of the national governance system and governance ability puts forward new requirements for the government to purchase public sports services.The government should better guide the participation of the masses,build a community of social governance that everyone is responsible for,everyone is responsible for and everyone enjoys,which has become a new direction for the government to purchase public sports services.The performance evaluation of government purchasing sports public service is not only a measure of purchasing performance,but also an important reference for improving purchasing work.This plays an important supervisory role in the process of the government purchasing sports public services.However,in the existing indicators,many of them are too broad and difficult to measure,and some of them are generally ignored.As a result,the evaluation results are not objective,accurate and comprehensive,which is difficult to meet the needs of the development of sports public services purchased by our government.To optimize the indicators of the problems in the performance evaluation of the government's purchase of sports public services.Follow the principle of objectivity and accuracy,build a set of indicators that are easy to measure and calculate.It is of great significance to promote the development of sports public service and guide the government to purchase sports public service.This research adopts the methods of literature,Delphi,subjective weight and mathematical statistics.This is based on the performance evaluation indicators and results of the government's purchase of sports public services.This is guided by the new requirements of national policies,the theory of public finance,the theory of public products,the theory of new public services,the guiding ideology of the modernization of national governance system and governance capacity.This study analyzes the existing performance evaluation indicators and the problems reflected in the results.This study draws on the previous research results in the field of performance evaluation indicators.The research refers to the guidance catalogue of government purchasing public cultural services from social forces.The research uses scientific computing software such as Excel,SPSS and MATLAB.This research starts from five dimensions: input,output,benefit,mass satisfaction and mass participation.This study screened out more than 20 evaluation indexes for three kinds of purchased projects,respectively.Finally,this study discusses the data results and discusses whether it is necessary to keep the index with low mean value.According to the data results,the weight of the five evaluation dimensions in the performanceevaluation of the government's purchase of sports public services is as follows: mass satisfaction0.3357,mass participation 0.2818,output 0.1727,benefit 0.1532,input 0.0567.In terms of the government's purchase of new site services,there are 5 indicators of mass satisfaction,5 indicators of mass participation,6 indicators of output,4 indicators of efficiency and 4 indicators of input.In terms of the free and low-cost open service of sports venues purchased by the government,there are 6 indicators of mass satisfaction,5 indicators of mass participation,6 indicators of output,6indicators of efficiency and 4 indicators of input.In terms of government purchase of national fitness activities and event services,there are 7 indicators of mass satisfaction,4 indicators of mass participation,5 indicators of output,7 indicators of efficiency and 4 indicators of input.According to this study: First,the evaluation weight should be divided according to the order of No.1 of mass satisfaction,No.2 of mass participation,No.3 of output,No.4 of benefit and No.5of input.Second,in different evaluation projects,the important indicators are different,so the evaluation system must be built according to specific projects.Third,to make the performance evaluation indicators more close to the objective reality of purchasing services as a whole,rather than the overall goal of sports development,and to improve the degree of quantification of the indicators will help solve the problem that many performance evaluation indicators are confused with the overall goal of sports development.Fourth,considering the actual needs of different service groups,establishing more detailed evaluation indicators of the masses' satisfaction will help to solve the problem that the statistical results of the masses' satisfaction are difficult to become the basis for the government to improve its own work.Fifth,designing new indicators according to the cost of supervision is helpful to solve the problem that supervision cost is not valued.Sixthly,constructing the dimension of mass participation in the evaluation index system is helpful to solve the problem that the existing indexes do not show the characteristics of sports governance modernization.The recommendations of this study are as follows: First,build a new performance evaluation index system around the satisfaction and participation of the masses.Second,around the characteristics of the purchase project,build a targeted performance evaluation index system.Third,improve the proportion of quantitative indicators to ensure the objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation results.Fourth,refine the indicators of mass satisfaction and improve the daily feedback channels of the masses.Fifth,make use of big data sports public service mobile platform and blockchain technology to enrich data sources and promote the improvement of cost indicators.Sixth,speed up the construction of the dimension of mass participation,and purchase services on the basis of the active participation of the masses.