Effect Of Framework Effect On Badminton Players’Receiving And Serving Motivation Conflict

For competitive badminton,the rapid development in recent years,more and more fierce confrontation,higher and higher requirements.The situation of badminton court is changeable,and the players’ batting state is always in different changes of attack,confrontation and defense.Good technical action and tactical strategy need accurate control of hitting motivation.The conflict of avoiding motivation is not only the embodiment of various thinking activities of athletes on the field,but also the specific action of the game.In badminton,the player is the scorer.The first bat holds the initiative,while the second bat belongs to the post-producer.Only after the opponent strikes the direction of the first bat,can the receiver receive the service through pre-judgment and reaction.The receiver needs to bear certain psychological burden.Once the receiver fails,the opponent can score directly.Although high-quality service and variable service routes can increase the difficulty of receiving service,under the guidance of targeted service reception,they can also resolve the advantages of the other side and transform into their own advantages.This study focuses on motivational conflicts in badminton competitions.From the perspective of framework effect,the top eight singles players in group A of Beijing University Badminton Championships are selected as the research objects to explore whether the framework effect exists in badminton competitions.In the risk decision-making of receiving and serving,the author tries to explain the mental state of the players under the frame effect.The conclusions are as follows:In the hypothetical situation,when the score of match points is similar,the positive frame is used to describe the conflict of receiving and serving motivation,the players’ risk decision is conservative,while the negative frame is adventurous;thecoaches’ positive language pressure can make the decision conservative,while the negative language pressure is adventurous;in the sports situation of too eager to win and the psychological orientation of "impacting the opponent",the positive frame is used to describe the conflict of receiving and serving motivation.Under the hypothetical situation,the decision-making of athletes tends to be risky,while the negative framework reduces the proportion of risky.In general,the framework effect of the decision-making of athletes appears in the hypothetical situation.2.In the real competition situation,the overall decision-making of athletes tends to be conservative,not easy to take risks and not take the initiative to make mistakes.The pain of the initiative to make mistakes outweighs the happiness of the acquisition,which is inconsistent with the classic risk selection results of frame effect.3.In the hypothetical situation,the athletes’ psychological state is stable,not affected by the changes of physical fitness,referees,audiences and other internal and external complex environment.Their emotional fluctuation is small.They make judgments under cognitive decision-making.Their risk decision-making judgement is more inclined to theoretical choice.In the real competition situation,the athletes are more conservative and cautious,more judgments under intuitive decision-making,and less susceptible.To the effect of frame effect.