Clinical Effect Of "Somatic Movement Techniques During Needle Retention" In The Treatment Of Acute Kidney Colic

Objective:In this paper,we observed clinical indicators such as pain intensity score,accompanying symptom score,analgesic onset time,and recurrence after treatment of acute renal colic in the control group(ordinary acupuncture group)and the experimental group("Somatic movement Techniques during Needle Retention" group).To compare the clinical efficacy of the two groups in the treatment of acute renal colic,to provide a simple and effective clinical treatment for the disease,and to promote the application of "Somatic movement Techniques during Needle Retention".Methods:1.62 patients with acute renal colic admitted to the emergency department of Chongqing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from October 2017 to October 2018 were selected as the subjects of study.According to the random number grouping method,the patients were divided into control group and experimental group,31 cases in each group.2.The control group was treated with electro-acupuncture at Ashi point,waist Jiaji point and Zusanli point on the affected side,and retained the needle for about 30 minutes after electrification.On the basis of the control group,the experimental group used the method of "Chest-flank cough method" extension when retaining needles.After treatment,the patients were followed up for 24 hours.3.By comparing the improvement of pain intensity score,accompanying symptom score,overall score,onset time of analgesia,recurrence of the two groups after treatment,and statistical analgesic efficacy,overall efficacy and other indicators,to evaluate the difference of clinical efficacy between the two groups.Result:1.There was no significant difference in general data of sex,age,stone location,average stone diameter and stone diameter classification between the two groups(P>0.05),which was comparable.2.There was no significant difference in pain intensity score,concomitant symptom score and overall score between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).3.There were significant differences in pain intensity score,concomitant symptom score and overall score between the two groups after treatment(P<0.05).4.There were significant differences in pain intensity scores between the two groups after treatment(P<0.05);there were no significant differences in symptoms scores and overall scores between the two groups after treatment(P>0.05).5.There was significant difference in analgesic effect between the two groups(P<0.05).6.There was no significant difference in the overall efficacy between the two groups(P>0.05).7.There was significant difference in the onset time of analgesia between the two groups(P<0.05).8.There was no significant difference in pain recurrence between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:1.The pain intensity score,concomitant symptom score and overall score of the control group and the experimental group have obvious improvement effect on acute renal colic,while the improvement effect of the experimental group on the pain intensity score is better than that of the control group,and the improvement effect on the concomitant symptom score and the overall symptom score is basically the same.2.The analgesic time of the control group and the experimental group for acute renal colic is short,the analgesic effect and the overall effect are remarkable,while the analgesic time of the experimental group is shorter than that of the control group,the analgesic effect is better than that of the control group,and the overall effect is basically the same.3.The recurrence rate of the control group and the experimental group is basically the same,both are safe and effective.