A Comparative Study On The Argument Framework Of Arbitration Cases Between China And Philippine Media In South China Sea

The dispute over the South China Sea has been a long time.On January 22,2013,the Philippine accusation China unilaterally imposed a compulsory arbitration in the Philippines and South China Sea in an attempt to conceal the fact that it illegally occupied some of the islands in the South China Sea and legitimized its territorial sover eignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea.In the face of the new form of di spute initiated by the Philippine side,China's mainstream media fully play its role.The China Daily and its China Daily have expressed China's correct position and fully introduced China's historical and legal basis to foreign people.The community for China to win the public opinion field.The Philippine media has been working with the Philippine whirlpool in the South China Sea Arbitration case,which has influenced Western countries' views on the arbitration case.Its use of the news reporting framework,to a large extent affected the Western media coverage of the South China Sea arbitration.Based on the analysis of the media framework of the Chinese side and the Philippine media,this paper,based on the theory of the news frame of Zang Guoren,thr ough the method of content analysis and comparative analysis,the paper selects the China Daily and China Daily News,"The official website for the study.This paper analyzes the relevant topics of the arbitration case after arbitration,arbitration and arbitration,and analyzes the rhetoric and lexical selection from the subject,the source of the report and the report,and finds out the news of the investigation of the arbitration contract in the South China Sea The characteristics of the framework and the difference.This paper is divided into five parts,the first part is the introduction,mainly exp lains the source of the topic and the related background and the significance of the study,the study of the South China Sea at home and abroad,the framework of the relevant review,research object and research innovation At the office.The second and th ird parts of the China Daily Network and the "Philippine Daily Information Daily" we bsite from the reported theme,source,length,subjective framework analysis,the fourth part of the media coverage of the two media from the subject The source,rhetoric and vocabulary selection,and the fifth part summarizes the results of the comparative analysis.Through the study found that the report of the China Daily has a government sp okesman's coverage of the framework,tend to quote the spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,the Government's direct position and other positions,and the "four no" position more rigid stereotypes and no reason to argue,The lack of legal aspects of the specific exposition of the report,while the Philippine side know how to use the United States and Japan and other countries of public opinion support for their own to create a good international environment.The choice of the frame of the Philippine side,the way of information presentation,the selection of frame limits have an adverse impact on China's arbitration position internationally.China and the Philippines re ported from the source of the selection,the size of the length of the content of the tendencies are very different.Which can be found in the China Daily reported that the framework needs to improve and improve the place.Therefore,in the future reports,China Daily News to innovate expression,learn from experience,promote the spread of China's English media,China's position on the South China Sea arbitration full exp ression of the rich for China to win international public opinion.