Objective:To observe clinical curative effect of the Qingli-xuanhua method as tutor's the main treatment experience formula,and compare scores of the symptoms before and after the treatment,as well as the total effective rate of treatment group and control group.Method:30 children were each selected aged from 2 to 14 in conformity with the inclusion criteria of two groups.The treatment group received the medicinal broth to take orally,medicine composition:honeysucklelOg,forsythia 10g,bitter almond 10g,perillaseed 9g,mulberry leaves 10g,platycodon grandiflorum 6g,radix peucedani 10g,the root bark of white mulberry 10g,cynanchum glaucescens 10g,dried tangerine or orange peel 6g,radix liquiritiae 5g.The control group received the Chinese patent medicine to take orally,including Pudilan oral liquid(SFDA approval number:Z20030095,medicine composition:dandelion,Corydalis bungeana,radix isatidis,radix scutellariae)and Xijue mixture(Su medicine system word:Z04000819 medicine composition:almond,platycodon grandiflorum,dried tangerine or orange peel,liquorice).And decide the dose according to the age of children.Set the standard of infantile cough with wind-heat phlegm syndrome,and observe whether the symptoms and signs improved after treatment of two groups.Evaluated the clinical curative effect after a week treatment and analyse the date by SPSS22.0 data analysis software.Results:(1)Compared the total effective rate,the tradition Chinese medicine group clinical cure in 10 cases,markedly effective in 13 cases,effective in 6 cases,invalid in 1 case,total effective rate 96.67%which was higher than the control group.The control group clinical cure in 5 cases,markedly effective in 11 cases,effective in 8 cases,invalid in 6 cases,the total effective rate was 80.00%.The total effective rate of two groups were tested,P<0.05,showing significant difference.So,total effective rate of treatment group was obviously better than the control group.(2)The comparison on gender,age,and the course before the treatment of two groups showed there was no significant difference(P>0.05),no statistical significance.(3)Before the treatment,the scores comparsion of primary symptoms and minor symptoms between two groups showed there was no significant differences(P>0.05),no statistical significance,and was comparable of two groups.7 days after treatment,compared the scores of two groups of primary symptoms and minor symptoms,the result showed every time all has decreased;The comparison on symptoms integral of thirst,aversion to wind,pulse manifestation after the treatment showed there was no significant difference in both groups,no statistical significance(P>0.05);Besides,compared other symptoms integral of two groups,showing there was significant difference(P<0.05),with statistical significance.After the 7 days of treatment group,the primary symptoms and minor symptoms integrals were obvious different(P<0.05),with statistical significance.After the 7 days of the control group,there was no significant difference of aversion to wind integral after treatment(P>0.05),no statistical significance;But residual symptoms integral decreased significantly(P<0.05),with statistical significance.Conclusion:The clinical curative effect of treatment group was obviously superior to control group,which could be used to refer and guide the treatment of the clinical cough wind heat complicated with phlegm in chlidren significantly. |