| Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of the treatment for neck type of cervical spondylosis of cervical spondylosis with the method of relaxing tendons and collaterals,and to provide a reliable basis for the treatment neck type of cervical spondylosis.Methods:1 The collection from December 2015 to February 2017 in Kunming Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine orthopedic clinic and inpatient treatment of neck type of cervical spondylosis patients,in line with the inclusion criteria of 62 patients,according to random number table method was randomly divided into treatment group and control group,were removed off cases,at the end of this research,60 cases of neck type of cervical spondylosis patients the object of study,the treatment group(30cases)and control group(30 cases).2 Treatment methods: the treatment group was given the treatment of Shu jin Tong luo method of treatment,once a day;the control group to give traction treatment,once a day.3 Course of treatment: a course of treatment for 2 weeks,continuous treatment of 2courses.4 Observation indicators: the simple Mc Gill pain scale,NPQ neck pain scale and VAS pain score were used to compare the patient before and after treatment scores to assess the efficacy.5 Statistical methods: SPSS22.0 statistical software for statistical analysis.Results:1 In this study,the patients who met the criteria were selected for the final 60 cases.Two groups of patients with gender,age,course of disease,treatment before the NPQ neck pain scale score,VAS pain score and the short form Mc Gill pain scale of PRI,VAS and PPI score,statistical analysis,P>0.05,there was no statistically significant difference,and the general data of the two groups the NPQ neck pain scale score,VAS pain score and the short form Mc Gill pain scale of PRI,VAS and PPI score were comparable.2 Mc Gill pain scale of PRI,VAS and PPI scores are used to compare: two groups of patients before and after treatment Mc Gill pain scale compared with statistical significance(P<0.05),which shows that the two kinds of treatment methods after treatment,two groups of patients with PRI,VAS and PPI score can change with treatment,the two groups were significantly decreased compared with before treatment,the two treatment methods can improve patients with cervical spondylosis pain,promote functional recovery;Comparison between groups,two groups of patients after treatment by PRI,VAS and PPI scores were compared between the two groups after treatment Mc Gill pain scale,VAS,PRI and PPI score,P<0.05,the difference was statistically significant;the treatment group not only in reducing the Mc Gill pain scale score than the control group,but also in improving patients with neck pain,recover the function,eliminate the adverse situation because of pain Thread and other aspects are better than the control group.3 NPQ neck pain scale: group comparison,the two groups of patients before and after treatment by NPQ neck pain scale score comparison,P<0.05,the difference was statistically significant.The two methods can relieve neck and shoulder pain and discomfort,improve the sleep quality of patients,improve the ability to work;Comparison between groups,two groups of patients after treatment NPQ neck pain scale score,P<0.05,The difference was statistically significant,indicating that the treatment group in improving the degree of neck pain in patients with restore cervical function,improve quality of life and so on better than the control group.4 VAS pain questionnaire: comparison of two groups of patients before and after treatment of VAS pain score,P<0.05,there was statistical significance,which indicates that these two kinds of treatment methods can alleviate patients with neck pain and discomfort;VAS pain score of two groups of patients after treatment,P<0.05,there was statistical significance,indicating that the treatment group to improve the degree of neck pain is better than the control group.5 The recurrence rate of the two groups were compared: The recurrence rate was18.1% in the treatment group and 20.0% in the control group,the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05),indicating that there was no significant correlation between the recurrence rate of the two groups.6 The two groups of patients with curative effect comparison: after the course of treatment,the treatment group that total effective rate was 93.3%,the control group that total effective rate was 83.3%,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),indicating that the treatment group was better than the control group.Conclusions:1 The two kinds of treatment methods for neck type of cervical spondylosis patients have better curative effect,in which the treatment group(Shujin Tong luo method)effect is better than the control group(traction therapy).2 Compared with the pain scale,the two treatment methods can relieve the discomfort of neck pain,and the treatment group(Shu jin Tong luo method)has better curative effect than the control group(traction therapy).3 Shujin Tong luo method treatment the neck type of cervical spondylosis better than traction therapy,the effect is significant. |
PDF Full Text Request