The Clinical Study On Treating Stroke Hemiplegia Syndrome By Tongyuan Acupuncture

Objective:In this clinical trial,randomized controlled trials were used to divide patients with stroke sequelae into two groups according to the principle of randomized grouping.The treatment group was treated with acupuncture and moxibustion,and the control group was treated with traditional acupuncture and moxibustion.The course of treatment was 7 days.After two courses of treatment,the Barthel index score,FIM score,post-stroke hemiplegia recovery six-stage evaluation and clinical overall evaluation criteria were used to observe the clinical efficacy of the two groups of stroke sequelae.The clinical efficacy of stroke sequelae,the preliminary study of the theoretical characteristics of the method.Method:In this clinical trial,randomized controlled trials were used to divide patients with stroke sequelae into two groups according to the principle of randomized grouping.The treatment group was treated with acupuncture and moxibustion,and the control group was treated with traditional acupuncture and moxibustion.The course of treatment was 7 days.After two courses of treatment,the Barthel index score,FIM score,post-stroke hemiplegia recovery six-stage evaluation and clinical overall evaluation criteria were used to observe the clinical efficacy of the two groups of stroke sequelae.The clinical efficacy of stroke sequelae,the preliminary study of the theoretical characteristics of the method.Results:1.Before and after treatment,there was no significant difference between the two groups in age,sex,activity of living activity scale(Barthel index score),functional independent determination(FIM score),postoperative stroke hemiplegia recovery six-stage evaluation(Brunnstrom assessment)>0.05).The two groups were comparable.2.After treatment Barthel index score:t = 8.012,p = 0.000<0.01,indicating that the two groups after treatment score difference is very obvious,the results were statistically significant.In the treatment group,the Barthel index score was compared with the control group,t =-12.711,p = 0.000<0.01,indicating that the Barthel index score,the treatment group before and after treatment differences were significant,the results were statistically significant.In the control group,the Barthel index score was compared with the control group,t =-5.410,p = 0.000<0.01,indicating that the Barthel index score,the control group before and after treatment differences were significant,the results were statistically significant.3.After treatment FIM score:t = 7.55,p = 0.000<0.01,indicating that the two groups after treatment FIM score was significantly different,the results were statistically significant.The FIM score of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group(t =-16.912,p = 0.000<0.01).The results showed that there was significant difference between the treatment group and the FIM score.In the FIM score,the control group was significantly different from the control group before and after treatment,the results were statistically significant(P<0.05).4.The six-stage evaluation of hemiplegia after stroke was analyzed:Z ?-1.632 and p = 0.103>0.05,respectively.The distribution of Brunnstrom in the two groups before treatment was not significant,Indicating that after treatment in both groups after hemiplegia in the recovery of the number of cases at all stages of the comparison is not statistically significant.5.Comparison of the overall efficacy after treatment:Through the rank sum test analysis:Z =-2.508,p = 0.012<0.05,indicating that the two groups in the overall efficacy of significant differences,the results were statistically significant.Conclusion:1.Before treatment,the two groups did not have statistical differences in gender and age,including the daily living activity scale(Barthel index score),functional independent determination(FIM score),post-stroke hemiplegia recovery There was no statistical difference between the two groups(Brunnstrom),indicating that the experimental data were comparable.2.After treatment,the results of Barthel index score and FIM score were statistically different(P<0.01),which indicated that both treatments could improve the patients' condition.Compared with the control group,there was significant difference between the Barthel index and the FIM score in the treatment group,which indicated that the degree of improvement of the treatment was better than that of the control group.3.Compared with the control group,the total effective rate of the treatment group was better than that of the control group,and the clinical treatment cases were not found in the two groups.4.There was no significant difference in the number of cases between the two groups before and after treatment in Brunnstrom assessment,indicating that the efficacy of the two groups was not statistically significant in the six-stage assessment of hemiplegia after stroke.