The Comparative Study Of Green Building Ideas And Strategies About Thomas Herzog And Ken Yeang

With the development of human society,the environment problem has been increasingly prominent,and the ecological environment suffered great damages.Due to the construction activity consumes lots of energy and resources,there has a strong impact on the ecological environment.Aiming at the sustainable development of environment problems,some of the green ecological architects began to a series of exploration,German architect Thomas Herzog and Malaysia architect Ken Yang are two of the representative of them.Their experience is worth of reference,and there exist differences between their green building ideology and styles.Has the value to make a comparative study and fully understand their essence.In this paper,by using the method of literature analysis,comparative research and inductive analysis,involving two architects of the results of a vast amount of literature at home and abroad,especially foreign literature data collection,analysis and summary,set up the comprehensive comparison program,carries on the detailed analysis,the paper summarizes the different architectural works,combing the difference between the two green architects green architectural creation expression methods and the concepts.And concludes the enlightenment and significance to the development of green building in China.Article mainly from the background sources,green building design ideas,architecture technique these three aspects of the comparative study on ecological design strategy and implications,a total of four parts.The second chapter from the background of the two,such as cultural background,ideological trend influence and the era of responsibility,look for the relationship between the background and the thought source of two with comparison;The third chapter is about the green building thought of two people,mainly from the passive design ideas,unique ecological thought,integrating design,research areas and regional comparison on the similarities and differences in their design idea;The fourth chapter embarks from the case works of the two,the design of architectural works and ecological strategy analysis is discussed and compared;Finally,as the enlightenment and significance,based on the two architects design train of thought,summarized the design method of a set of green building,and puts forward suggestions for the development of contemporary green building in China.Through the comparative study,we found that as a result of the two architects different education and cultural background,under the influence of different architecture ideological trends,the two has many similarities and differences on green building thoughts and works of form style.They are all based on the passive principle Bioclimatology method,pay close attention to ecological,building energy conservation,construction technology and construction area,despite their processing technique,ecological strategy and focus may be exist some differences,but their final purpose and the pursuit are the same,all in order to reduce building energy consumption and the realization of the aim of sustainable development.From the two green ecological architecture design idea and the analysis of their works,we can comprehend two architects ideas and thinking process.Green ecological architecture in the contemporary China is at a new rapid start stage of vigorous development,and the Chinese architects general understanding of green architecture design methods and ideas on some deficiencies.Believe that through the analysis and comparison of two architects,there can bring some inspiration for our country's architects.