Study On Southeast Asian Interaction Between Urban And Rural In The View Point Of Factor Flows

The interaction between urban and rural is not only the embodiment of industrialization and urbanization, but also the requirement of promoting the coordinated development of urban and rural areas and the continuous progress. The positive interaction between urban and rural areas needs to break through the existing separation system of urban and rural areas, and to break the one-way flow pattern of all kinds of factors in urban and rural areas. The positive interaction between urban and rural areas is conducive to the common development of urban and rural areas and the overall optimization of regional spatial structure, and promote the optimization of resource allocation. Southeast Asia, as an important part of the world economy, its economic development and social changes are eye-catching. In recent years, the rapid economic growth, the level of urbanization in Southeast Asia, the rapid development of society, as a relatively dense population, its urban and rural relations are closely related to each other as the driving force of the common development of the characteristics. Southeast Asian Studies National City country elements flow and the interaction between urban and rural development, both for the rich and interactive mode, urban-rural relations theory, but also had an important reference value to the southeast coastal region of China’s population is relatively dense of coordinated development of urban and rural areas.Firstly, the interaction between urban and rural are described and classified according to research summary. Secondly, I studied on urbanization development stage of factor flows and urban-rural relations,discussed the characteristic structure in developed and developing countries. The particular form of urban-rural relations after urbanization and features Southeast Asian countries were analyzed, and studied the relationship between urban and rural areas of urbanization and urbanization processes.Then, from the perspective of urban and rural interactive factor mobility studies in Southeast Asia, with population mobility patterns, financial, food, and land elements of the four categories of factors, analyzed urban-rural interaction. And select typical Southeast Asian countries, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore three countries as the typical countries, and from the perspective of factor flows, research the causes of urban and rural interactive form. Finally, to generalize success and failure factors in urban and rural areas in Southeast Asia t, from the establishment of a sound market mechanism and optimization features urban-rural relations perspectives put forward policy recommendations.The main work and conclusions are as follows:(1)The factor flows have a certain influence on urban-rural relations. In the liberal economic model, improve agricultural productivity and advancing the process of industrialization,the elements in a free, two-way flow between urban and rural areas, to achieve the optimal allocation of resources, upgrading the industrial structure,increase the level of urbanization, urban and rural positive interaction. Improving urban-rural relations are established micro-level factors promoting faster flow rates and features two-way flow mechanism. While in the developed and developing countries of different levels of economic development and factor markets, the emergence of the urban and rural space model metropolitan area stretches to interact with two regions Desakota characteristics.(2)In most of the countries in Southeast Asia,the "catch-up" style urbanization aimed to achieve the city’s economic growth, so it accelerated one-way flow elements, but urbanization and industrialization were felling behind the process of urbanization, widening gap between urban and rural areas, and urban disease appears.This feature only relying on investment-led economic growth and urban population into cities blindly raise the level of the city is a "fade urbanization." This "fade urbanization" also reflects the relationship between urban and rural elements flow is not matched.(3) According to the level of economic development, select Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam to study. To the highest stage of the development of urban-rural relations in Singapore thanks to their completely free and open market policies and sound complete structure. The early appearance of counter-urbanization phenomenon due to factors Malaysia blind migration presents a false high level of urbanization, and ultimately lead to "counter-urbanization" phenomenon, economic development is impaired. Vietnam’s urban-rural gap got expanded by two main causes: migration and policy bias. Unidirectional transfer of population growth explains why the differences in speed become more, policies tend to further accelerate the capital element of the village to the city transfer. Between industry and agriculture, the imbalance between heavy and light industry investment evident. And industrial and agricultural products price-related finance, policy factors, such as overvalued exchange rates, export quotas and high tariffs on industrial products protection, urban people are thought to generate revenue, but at the expense of the interests at the expense of rural people.(4)The policies for accelerating the urban and rural development focus on factors market and rural-urban system.Including improving working to implement labor market, financial markets and the land transfer market, the elimination of barriers to factor mobility in the presence of reasonable elements from optimization market and establish and improve the layout of both urban and rural areas; by urban and rural integration replacing urban bias policy development policy to promote free movement of factors of urban and rural positive interaction.