A Comparative Study Of Luoyang City Public And Private Rural Junior High Physical Education Teaching

Countries in the " Twelfth Five-Year Plan" has been clearly pointed out theneed to accelerate the development of a strategic approach to education reform, whileco-ordinating the development of education at all levels, continuing to promoteeducational equity, making the full implementation of quality education, continuing todeepen education reform. And demanded us a comprehensive and fully implement theParty’s basic education policy, to ensure that our citizens receive education policy to geteffective protection. In China, the agricultural population occupy a major position. Inthe public and private junior high school of rural area,physical education teaching inrural plays an important role in the implementation of quality education session.In this paper, the use of literature, a variety of methods questionnaire, expertinterview, mathematical statistics, comparative law. A comparative study of LuoyangCity in rural public and private junior high physical education teaching. The surveymainly are:①rural public and private junior high school physical education teachingcarried out a comparative analysis of Luoyang City, including the choice of sportsteaching objectives to develop, implement physical education and health curriculum,physical education content and teaching arrangements, physical education teachers inteaching assessment of teaching methods, the use of physical education teachers onstudent achievement in sports;②Luoyang rural junior high school physical educationteachers in public and private teachers comparative analysis with PE teachers, physicaleducation teachers by gender and age structure, physical education teachers in theeducational structure and titles, PE teacher workload and assessment, physicaleducation teacher salaries and benefits:③Luoyang rural junior high school studentsin public and private sports study comparative analysis, like the degree of physicaleducation students, student motivation sports school, student self-evaluation;④Luoyang comparative analysis of rural public and private junior high school physicaleducation teaching and working environment, sports equipment and facilitiesinvestment, capital investment；⑤Luoyang rural public or private junior high schoolphysical education teaching problems analysis;⑥Luoyang rural public or privatejunior high school physical education teaching development countermeasures.The findings showed that:1Luoyang rural junior high school physicaleducation teaching in public and private conduct, the objective indicators of PhysicalEducation from the point of view the difference is not big, rural public junior highschool physical education teachers better than private-depth implementation of the "new course", public and private study sports learning work carried out are mainly theprivate than the public school physical education teachers are now able to better useteaching methods.2Luoyang rural junior high school teachers in public and private academic hierarchy and the title structure, age structure is more reasonable, but with afemale physical education teachers are unreasonable. Private than public schoolphysical education teacher workload. Private wages and benefits than public schoolsbetter.3Luoyang rural junior high school students in public and private sports learning,public and private high degree of physical education students like students’ motivationto participate in sports activities is very clear, the student’s self-evaluation is poor.4Luoyang rural public and private investment in terms of the material conditions ofjunior high school sports, from sports, equipment and facilities investment point ofview of private junior high school track and field venue in the number of sports venues,table tennis table are higher than public junior high school. Luoyang rural public andprivate junior high school junior high capital investment is better.