Study On Desciptive Style Of Quan Zuwang’ S Literary Works

Ruan Yuan praised Quan Zuwang mastered Confucian Canons, History and Literary. Quan Zuwang, as an important representative of East Zhejiang Scholarship, could measure up to the evaluation of Ruan Yuan. East Zhejiang Scholarship was expert in the research of Confucian Canons and History, and stressed historical certification by Confucian Canons and Statecraft Ideology. Ji, as a style, usually focused on narrate and had some discussions in them, so its contents were mess. Quan Zuwang’s was not so and his literary had much new development in the contents and art to come true the historical purpose that he wanted to preserve the documents in the countryside and the great ambitions that he wanted to uphold the world justice and preserve the Ethics.The contents of Quan Zuwang’s literary including especially two aspects:praise loyalty and chastity in the Yong Shang, and put the scholarship in the literary. The nature of two features was that the spirit of East Zhejiang Scholarship was applied in the creation. Selecting the loyalty and chastity which was no famous in the East Zhejiang was an important characteristic of the historical research. Quan Zuwang was born in the Yong Shang and firstly selected the loyalty and chastity as honoring targets who included the scholars and interregnum in Yong Shang after the Song Dynasty. They were not mostly record in the annals and their deeds were not clear. Quan Zuwang studied Yong Shang and its scholars, and then criticized shallowness atmosphere and praised the practical spirit of Statecraft Ideology to set forth his scholarship views. As the scholars and their scholarship he wrote were not clear, there were a lot of scholarship history and criticism in the literary, so the feature of putting the scholarship in the literary was very clear.The progress of art of descriptive style works written by Quan Zuwang is manifested in acceptation and deviation of method of righteousness. On behalf of Tongcheng School for Fang Bao paid attention to’argumentation’,’textual research’and’language’, and Quan Zuwangagreed with them. However, when it came to’argumentation’, Quan Zuwang was different from Fang Bao, and he thought highly of original meaning of literature, which illustrated a general and complex distinction.