Comparison Of The Clinical Efficacy Of The Two Methods Of Treatment Of Tibial Fractures

Objective: Comparison of Chinese and Western medicine combinedwith intramedullary nail fixation combines two locking platefixation methods for the treatment of tibial fracture strengthsand weaknesses, and provide reference for clinical treatment.Methods: Select50cases of tibial fracture patients from201203-201309revenue in our department were randomly divided intotraditional Chinese medicine combined with intramedullary nailfixation group (25people) and Western medicine combined withlocking plate fixation group (25people). Preoperative given beforea group of Chinese Herbs and topical combination nail surgery, afterlocking plate group was given medicine and surgery. Both observedbefore surgery swelling time, operation time，bloodloss,postoperative complications, length of stay, fracture healingat different times, using tibial fractures (Johner&Wruh,1983)evaluation criteria to assess the efficacy of recovery, thefollow-up patient satisfaction, compare the effect of two kindsof treatment therapies.Results: Chinese medicine combined with intramedullary nailinggroup and western medicine locking plate fixation group comparedto the preparation time before surgery, hospital stay, healing time statistically significant (P <0.05), and blood loss, postoperativecomplications, the difference between follow-up patientsatisfaction was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion: Two treatment methods are effective for the treatmentof tibial fracture method. Chinese medicine combined beforeintramedullary nailing of tibial fracture treatment shortpreparation time, swelling fast, shorter hospital stay, fasterfracture healing time, and blood loss, postoperative complicationsand western medicine similar locking plate fixation.