On The Influence Of Network Public Opinion On Judicial

In the new millennium of entering the era of web 2.0, we entered the times of the public microphone from the era of the big horn and the media projector lamp, which leads to the situation that everybody has become the source of information and we can meet the information flow everywhere. Our concept is changing with it massively, which is accepted passively before, while now is to create forwardly now. The internet brings more trouble to the society as well, when we enjoy the convenience given by the network, while the matter of the internet public voices occurs frequently when the trouble is reflected in the judicial activities, along with the continuous scale and influence. The network public opinions have affected on the previous “Xuting case”, along with the near “Limoumou rape case”. Actually, the public opinions on the internet play inestimable roles on some cases which are representative in the judicial practice, which is not only accelerate the evolvement of the case, but also accelerate the judicial justice in some extent. Therefore, a lot of people think that the public voices on the internet would affect on the judicial verdict too much, which even leads to the situation on the trial of network public voices. The paper starts with the influence from the internet public opinions to the judicial verdict, the author believes that the network public opinions do not affect judicial trial too much after analysis. Our country’s judicial is not independent of political, which reflects, in order to calm down the public emotion, the government will compel the judicial department when one judicial case become the matter of internet public opinions, while the court or the judge will choose to compromise because of the political pressure. In addition, the disadvantages of the network public opinions itself, along with other different reasons, resulting of the conflictions between judicial trial and the pubic voices on the internet. In order to resolve the questions existed among them, we could consider from the below two respects: 1. we should reform the judicial system, making the court being independent of the administrative system, which allow the court or the judge to use their rights of trial without any worries; 2. we should enhance the legislation on the network media and the regulation of it. The author consists on that we could relieve the conflictions between judicial trial and network public opinions by the hard work on the above two respects, as well as realize the benign interaction among them in the judicial practice.