| During the new period and under the new condition, building the harmonious socialist society in Chinese feature way is in full swing. And the governance of public progress in rural area in effective way has become a top priority during the task of constructing the Harmonious Society and building the New Socialist Countryside. Currently, the transformation and development of "agriculture, farmers and countryside" is requiring for continuous improvement of public goods and services in rural area.Simultaneously, the improvement of public goods in rural areas also greatly affects the rural economy and social development.Whether to ensure the effective supply of rural public goods or not, we should recognize and study its close relationship with government behaviour, so that the rural public goods can be effectively supplied.This paper, from the perspective of Public Choice Theory and choose the government behaviour as the cutting point, integrating use of the literature research, theory research and the investigation research, qualitative and quantitative research methods to qualitatively describe the concept of government behaviour, rural public goods and the relationship between government behaviour and rural public goods as well as the empirical data quantitatively analyzing, and then analyzes the government behaviour is the factor that influence the supply efficient of rural public goods.On the basis of combing the practical conditions, puts forward the relevant counter measures and suggestions from the decision-making, supply, inancing, regulation and other aspects of the government behaviour to improve the public goods supply in rural areas.And draw related conclusions:Government should play a necessary role in the supply of public goods in rural areas and its functions must be in a reasonable position; government behaviour is the major factor that influneces the effecctive supply of public goods in Nanning rural area, and to regulate the government behaviour is the necessary condition to ensure the effective supply of public goods in rural areas; it is more practically significant and operational than executing the multi-governance to strengthen the government’s own conduct in the supply of public goods in rural areas. |