From Worship To Rationality

The third plenary meeting of the11th session of CPC in1978, Which marks the Chinese society into a new era of reform and opening up and modernization. A social change led by the economic field in the vast land quietly,"Taking economic construction as the center" has made remarkable achievements in the process of market-oriented. The economic base of the profound changes brought about the restructuring and development of the superstructure, China’s economic class of the media in the process of market economy from scratch out of the general framework of the political practice, then set up their independent personality of the media and own statement said that the way. In the shadow of China’s social market economic sense, the economic media of China has take rational reflection and criticism of the phenomenon, which regarded as a social reality of the gods in the sense of joy and pride again and again of the growth in GDP.The propose of this paper is about the social status changes of GDP from worship to transcend with the interaction between the evolution of the discourse. Through the use of critical discourse and analysis theory from Van Dijk, we select the samples of our mainstream economic discourse media representative from1995to2011news discourse as a framework, such as semantic macrostructutes-. superstructure^microscopic structure> style and rhetoric. Then analyze two sets of discourse samples with Norman Fairclough’s intertextuality analysis theory, Then summed up three notable features of the changes of GDP news:First, the political discourse in domination and economic discourse in attachment of the worship stage of GDP; Secondly, the political discourse lose domination position and economic discourse in highlight; Third, under the affection of the concept of journalistic professionalism, the news discourse through the confusion has own itself awareness. At last, we discuss the supervision-. livelihood issues and rational in the GDP news and give some advice.With the deepening of social reforms, these types of discourse system will survive together and witness China’s economic development in the future.