Institutionalized Corruption In Academic Research

90years of the20th century, academic corruption is getting worse, people began to focus academic corruption, corruption of the academic discussion of a gradual increase. The21st century, the relevant state authorities such as the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology have developed a number of other prevention and punishment of corruption of academic regulations, together with the relevant provisions of the original intellectual property law, for the governance of academic corruption have played a certain role. But the academic corruption not only has not diminished, on the contrary intensified, much spark Negative effect and Precaution. Level of academic corruption cases increasing, the scope is increasing. The reason, both external environmental factors, such as the number of indicators of university research; supervision is weak; and internal reasons, the impetuous people, corruption and other low-cost and high yield. Academic corruption seriously affected了academic innovation capability enhancement, affected the country in the international creative competition on the academic strength, more importantly, is created an extremely bad social impact. How to deal with this social cancer of academic corruption, regulation by law is undoubtedly the most basic means. At present, for the academic study of corruption in the legal regulation of articles less, the existing lack of systematic and theoretical, it is necessary to sort out the existing literature on the basis of academic corruption prevention and control of legal issues in depth.This article is divided into six chapters, the introductory description Dissertations significance and research methods; the first chapter defines the concept of academic corruption; second chapter describes the history and current situation of academic corruption, examines the historical development of academic corruption, and analyzed the academic causes of corruption; third chapter describes the system of foreign academic corruption, governance and experience, analyzes the United States, four countries in Europe, Asia, the Japanese and South Korean anti-academic corruption practices and academic experience; In the fourth chapter presents academic corruption governance system and practice, academic morality, academic self-discipline, industry management in academic corruption prevention and control of the position and role; Analyzes the present situation of academic corruption legal governance and the shortage, and according to this situation, for the legal regulating academic corruption; the perfect The fifth chapter is epilogue, to generalize are summarized, and points out the limitations of papers and deficiencies.The innovation of this paper is based in combing the literature to define the concept of academic corruption, build a broad concept of academic corruption; to learn from foreign experience, academic corruption, governance and internal regulations on the basis of the construction for the prevention and Governance of academic corruption legal framework.Its limitations and shortcomings that the number of possession is not enough literature is rich in less first-hand information literature; some point owed appropriate language expressions is not enough and Refining.