Reflection On Discussion Of The Laws Of History By The New Chinese Historians

After the founding of the People’s Republic of China the historical materialism history in the historical rules reveals won the supreme status and role. Performance in proving. the historical rules become history research task, the contents of the Historical rules becomes the Historical structure analysis model and historical stage division framework. The historical rules laid off other theory as the referee, These conditions to history caused great confusion, these also shows that people need to reflect and clean the contents and the definition of the historical rules, as well as the specific status and role in the history, The Historical rules is not clear What to do, what can do for their own self. So it need to clean-up and reflect itself, to get rid of the past that "should not have"state. In the history of the historical rules find themselves", is the subject of the article.At the beginning of the discussion, the first aspect that the scholars concerned is what is the historical rules that speaking by historical materialism actually. The discussion of this aspect is use "return to The Marxism" as the goal.After the discussion, than ever before, the content of the scholars on the historical rules has indeed been great changes. But Contact with the historiography actual, the scholars felt that just have a carding of trace traceable type on the theory is not enough, We must contact the historians of its own characteristics and practical and explore the historical rules in historical science it own specific shape role, its also an epistemological considerations.These are for the three decades, the basic clues of the discussion about the historical rules, this article arrange its structure according to this clues.The first chapter as the fist introduce, the mainly purpose is to outline the contents of the object in the discussion of the historical rules in the new period. Include the following aspects:the three decades after the founding of the People’s Republic of China,the way that people accepted the historical rules, its main contents and characteristics; the reasons and the performance to the scientific worship of the history, which appeared based on the content of the historical rules.The second chapter is to review the theme of "Return to The Marxism", the understanding of the contents of the historical rules. From the discussion of the contents about the object, the core is the discussion of the content of historical rules that from the two aspects:the "verticaF" and the "horizontal" to break its single and limited explain. For the further reflection, the scholars consider the limitations of the contents of the historical rules attributed to the neglect caused by the subject and root position of "The realistic human being and their practice". In the view of the contents it achieve the major breakthrough of the realization of the historical rules.However, in the discussion, scholars feel the history, the topic of discussion about the historical rules is not good for it just around the "Return to The Marxism", It must also involve the subject of the history itself.And then there has a discussion of the epistemological focus from the historian’s own characteristics. This is the Contents of the third chapter.The third chapter relates to the discussion of the historical rules from the epistemological point of people. First it described the discussion of the definition of the historical epistemology. attitude of this definition is different. While, it is put forward, after all, represents the depth of exploration on this issue. Of course, just pointed out the understanding of the historian’s is not enough, We also should point out what a kind understanding of historians it is.This problem has in-depth as the scholars have a new understanding of the scientific nature of history. This is the historical rules in the history of "proposition of form.The conclusion is based on the discussion on the three decades inheritance, continuing the discussion into deep logic, inherit the conclusion,clean up the problem which trying to provide an accurate starting point platform for future discussions. In this part it is mainly proposed the proposition of "the three characters the historical rules in the history". The first is the role of the philosophical foundation, and the second is the"Methodology role", and the third is the role of knowledge product. On this basis, the outline of the relationship between the Historical science and the guiding ideology, and point out that there are not only has the guiding ideology of the history discipline but also has the history of science in guiding ideology of the inspection relations, between the two. Only in this way, the relationship between the two is comprehensive.