Wenshen Meridians Clinical Efficacy Of Pain Treatment Of Osteoporosis

Objective:To observe the evaluation Wenshen Tongluo pain Treatment of osteoporosis in clinical efficacy and safety.Methods:The study of the principles of randomized controlled random sequence generated by the spss19.0software, select the80cases of primary osteoporosis patients met the inclusion criteria,40cases were randomly divided into treatment group, control group40cases, the treatment group be warming kidney meridians pain Treatment of the control group was treated Caltrate D treatment, treatment for three months, the two groups before treatment, after treatment in January, March, after the treatment of clinical symptoms, biochemical indicators and bone mineral density in order to observe the clinical efficacy; after treatment, before and after treatment, blood, urine, stool, liver and kidney function, ECG and other safety indicators change, in order to observe its security.Results:by Wenshen Tongluozhitong treatment of two weeks after the treatment group the rate was30.76%, efficiency69.23%, with the control group,28.57%,64.28%, no significant difference was significantly superior to control group2,17.50%,52.50%,The difference between the groups with statistical significance. Treatment after one month treatment group was38.46%efficiency of84.61and control group1,42.85%,78.57%no significant difference, much better than the control group,23.07%,53.84%, after2months of treatment, treatment group was53.84%,92.30%with the control group rate was57.14%, efficiency92.85%no significant difference with the control to30.71%ingroup2,64.28%and there was significant difference (P<0.05). Three groups after treatment, body pain, weak waist pain, leg pain, walks with difficulty and other symptomshave improved, the total score of clinical symptoms were significantly decreased, and thetreatment group and control group, a difference not statistically significant, with controlgroup2, significant differences (P<0.05); femoral neck, Ward’s triangle two bone mineral density increased after treatment is not obvious, no comparative significance;treatment group and control group, a lumbar spine2-4, intertrochantcric indicators ofbone mineral density, treatment and treatment of two weeks, a month later there was no significant difference, and treatment of two months, no significant difference between the two groups, the treatment group, a control group treated for2months after lumbar2-4,intertrochanteric bone mineral density index change than the control group, significant differences (P <0.05). Three groups before treatment, after treatment, two weeks after treatment in January,2months after treatment, serum calcitonin was no significant difference (P>0.05), two weeks after the treatment group, serum calcitonin, parathyroid hormone, treatment, January after treatment, after treatment in February comparisonthere are significant differences (P <0.05), and better than the control group1, control group2, significant differences <0.05; treatment before and after blood, urine, fecalroutine, liver, security indicators of renal function, electrocardiogram examination nosignificant abnormalities; each group after treatment had no significant adverse reactions.Conclusion: Warming meridians pain Treatment of osteoporosis has significant effects, can improve bone density, improve the clinical symptoms, no adverse reactions, which can effectively prevent and treat osteoporosis.