Effects Of Glutamine-supplementation In Dietary Protein Levels On The Growth Performance Nad Related Blood Physiologic Biochemical Parameters Of Weanling Piglets | | Posted on:2013-07-31 | Degree:Master | Type:Thesis | | Country:China | Candidate:N N Li | Full Text:PDF | | GTID:2233330371965899 | Subject:Animal Nutrition and Feed Science | | Abstract/Summary: | PDF Full Text Request | | In this study, Gln appropriate protein levels in pigs diets was investigated through studying effects of glutamine (Gln) in dietary protein levels on the growth performance, blood biochemical ,immuno function and hormonal indicators of weanling piglets. It provide experimental evidence and scientific guidance to ease the piglet stress, reduce diarrhea rates, the rational use of Gln.One hundred and twenty crossbred Landrace×Large white weaned piglets at the age 28 days were selected and randomly divided into 6 treatment with 2 replicates. There was no significant difference between treatment groups on Initial body weight. Control groups incluingâ… ,â…¢andâ…¤were fed with basal diet and the protein levels of diets of the three groups were 18%, 20%,22%. While the pigs of experimental groups ofâ…¡,â…£andâ…¥were fed with the basal diet of control groupsâ… ,â…¢andâ…¤added 1.25% glutamine respectively. The results of the experiment conducted 28 days indicated that:â‘ The ADG of pigs in groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡respectively increased 8.45%(P>0.05)ã€4.11%(P<0.05)and 23.78%(P<0.05)compared with their control groups during the first two weeks; The ADG of pigs in groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡respectively increased 2.99%(P>0.05)ã€6.98%(P<0.05)and 2.83%(P>0.05)compared with their control groups during the second two weeks ;during the whole experiment, the ADG of pigs in groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡respectively increased5.23%(P>0.05)ã€13.19%(P<0.05)and 9.20%(P>0.05)compared with their control groups. The result of feed intake is that the average feed intake of pigs in groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡with a boosting trend compared with their control groups, but a significant diversity(P>0.05). The FCR of pig s in groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡descended 4.26%(P>0.05)ã€4.91%(P>0.05)and 11.49%(P<0.05)during the first two weeks compared with their control groups; The FCR of pigs in groupâ…¡descended 13.00%(P<0.05)compared with the control group, the other two groups have a significant diversity(P>0.05)compared with their control groups.â‘¡To compared with their control groups, The digestibility of crude protein of pigs in groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡respectively increased 4.76%(P<0.05)ã€3.69%(P<0.05)and 0.93% (P>0.05); The digestibility of crude fat respectively increased了6.30%,5.64%,7.15% and was significant .â‘¢To compared with their control groups,the ratio of diarrhea of groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡repectively significantly decreased by 60.76%ã€60.58% and 35.12%;Groupâ…£was 31.45% , 39.92% lower than groupâ…£,â…¡and was significant.â‘£The BUN of groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡was descended by 23.31%(P<0.05)ã€34.38%(P<0.05)and 37.78% compared with control respectively , groupâ…£was 41.60%(P<0.05)and 24.51%(P<0.05)lower than groupâ…¥andâ…¡;The Serum TP , GLU of groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡had a elevated trend and A/G depressed. TP was increased by 7.26%(P<0.05)ã€24.58%(P<0.05)and 5.89%(P>0.05), and 9.10%(P<0.05)ã€24.66%(P<0.05)and 26.08%(P<0.05)for GLU. The A/G was decreased by 8.32%(P<0.05)ã€12.60%(P<0.05)and 1.54%(P>0.05) than control ,Groupâ…¥ã€â…£was 17.05%(P<0.05)and 13.95%(P<0.05) than groupâ…¡separately.⑤The IgG of groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡was repectively increased by 11.77%(P<0.05)ã€26.58%(P<0.05)and 12.35%(P<0.05), Groupâ…£was 9.89%(P<0.05)and 5.26%(P>0.05)higher thanâ…¥ã€â…¡; That of C3 was 18.75%(P<0.05)ã€18.75%(P<0.05)and 26.67%(P<0.05)higher, and the IgM was increased by 19.23%(P<0.05)ã€40.00%(P<0.05)and 38.09%(P<0.05)respectively .â‘¥The GH of groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡was repectively increased by 21.31%(P<0.05)ã€22.95%(P<0.05)and 35.29%(P<0.05)than control , and groupâ…¥ã€â…£was 7.25%(P<0.05)and 8.70%(P<0.05)higher than groupâ…¡; The T3 of groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡was increased 48.94%(P<0.05)ã€43.27%(P<0.05)and 31.07(P<0.05)than control ; The Cor of groupâ…¥ã€â…£ã€â…¡was 18.29%(P>0.05)ã€20.58%(P>0.05)and 16.36%(P>0.05) lower than control , but no significant between each group. | | Keywords/Search Tags: | Glutamine, Piglets, Growth Performance, Blood indices, Immuno Function, Hormone index | PDF Full Text Request | Related items |
| |
|