The Clinical Research Of Tissue-Selecting Therapy And Top Hemorrhoids Stapler For Prolapsed Hemorrhoids

Objective:By observing the Tissue-Selecting and top hemorrhoids Therapy stapler with the external dissection and internal ligation procedure of prolapsed hemorrhoids cure rate, Surgery, postoperative complications, and anal function, objective evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of two surgical procedures, to assess the Tissue-Selecting Therapy stapler clinical value, and thus the practice of continuous improvement in the therapy and future options for the surgical treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoids to provide evidence.Methods:Select 50 patients withⅢ-Ⅳdegree prolapsed hemorrhoids, according to randomly assigned into treatment group (Tissue-Selecting Therapy and top hemorrhoids stapler, TST* group) and control group external dissection and internal ligation group) to observed treatment of each group, operation time, blood loss, intraoperative traction response rate, hospital stay, postoperative pain, anal margin of edema, urinary retention and postoperative patency defecation, stool frequency, rectal bulge, anal function.Results:No difference in the postoperative prolapse, bleeding, defecation, (P> 0.05); while in operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, postoperative anal pain, anal margin of edema the degree of bowel patency within a week than the control group (P<0.05); in the incidence of postoperative urinary retention compared with the control group no significant difference (P> 0.05).Conclusion:The two operation styles for prolapsed hemorrhoids and bleeding have similar effect.. TST* technique relatively short operation time, less blood loss, faster recovery time after surgery, short hospital stay, postoperative anal pain, edema lower incidence of postoperative anal margin, more smooth defecation.