A Hole Four Thorns Clinical Study Of Acute Lumbar Sprain

Objective:Clinical acute lumbar sprain is common, frequently-occurring disease, severe acute local pain, overturn activities difficult, affecting daily activities, to regret it more than government can become chronic low back pain. Therefore requested symptom relief in the shortest possible time, so as not to delay the timing of treatment, so that chronic disease to change. Treatment of this disease, the current Western medicine suggests sleep hard board beds, do functional exercises, and give symptomatic treatment; Chinese medicine treatments include acupuncture, massage and so on. Acupuncture treatment of this disease has obvious advantages and is safe, effective, etc, can best embody the therapy of "simple, convenient, experience, and cheap" feature, is the preferred treatment for the disease, but the way though there are many, but messy, and mostly descriptive, retrospective studies, prospective studies of very small numbers; currently lack a technical specification, effective and reliable and can be reused, extensive promotion of acupuncture treatment, so look for safe, standardized, effective treatment been more and more attention, but also for the clinical need. In this study, mentor Professor Jian Wei zhou clinical practice in long-term conclusion by exploring the creation of the treatment of pain syndrome Ashi treatment of acute lumbar sprain four thorns, to observe its efficacy and safety for acute lumbar sprain to find more for the effective and standard treatment.Methods:From June 2009 to January 2010, in the Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese subjects, the introduction of machine control study will meet diagnostic criteria for acute lumbar sprain, according to inclusion, exclusion criteria selected 70 patients with acute lumbar sprain were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, treatment group Ashi a point four spent needling control group treated by routine acupuncture method, the system effect indicators in patients before and after treatment, adverse reactions and safety indicators, the change of comparison differences between groups, analysis and evaluation of their clinical value.Results:65 patients completed the final test, in which 31 patients treated,34 patients in control group. The results are as follows:1. The therapeutic effect31 patients in the treatment group,21 cases were cured (67.7%), markedly 5 cases, effective 4 cases, invalid 1 patient, the total effective rate was 96.8%. Control group of 34 patients,15 were cured (44.1%), markedly 8 cases, effective in 8 cases, failure in 3 patients, the total effective rate was 91.2%. Therapeutic effect, p<0.01, the difference was very significant, indicating the treatment group better than the control group.Before and after treatment symptoms and signs score group were compared by statistical analysis, P<0.01, difference is very significant, indicating After treatment, symptoms and signs have improved significantly.2. Comparison of pain scores in the two groupsThe treatment group compared pain scores before and after treatment, P<0.01, shows the treatment group were due to improving pain caused by sprains effect is obvious; the control group pain scores before and after treatment compared, P <0.01, shows the control group in improving patients sprain caused due effect is obviously in pain.After treatment, the pain score difference comparison, p>0.05, indicating that two groups of acute lumbar sprain caused no significant difference in pain improvement.3. Scores between two groups of spinal mobilityBefore and after treatment scores between spinal mobility, p<0.01, treatment group shows improvements in spinal mobility is very obvious; the control group before and after treatment compared with lumbar activity, p<0.01, control group shows the improvement of spinal mobility is also evident.After treatment, spinal mobility score difference comparison, p<0.05, treatment group shows the improvement of spinal mobility better than the control group.4. Comparison of onset time of two groupsComparison of onset time of two groups, were significantly different (p<0.01), shows the treatment group than in the control group faster remission.5. Comparison of two treatment timeComparison of two treatment time, were significantly different (p<0.01), shows the treatment group than in the control group, a shorter healing time.Conclusion:1. Ashi points four thorns is a safe effective treatment for superior, safe operation, improve patient back pain, spinal mobility and so on have significant effects, and superior to conventional methods.2. Ashi points four thorns method to improve pain, spinal mobility and other aspects of the onset time earlier than conventional methods, can quickly alleviate the condition.3. Ashi points four thorns method to improve pain, spinal mobility and other aspects of the treatment time earlier than conventional methods, a shorter course of treatment.4. Ashi points four thorns safe and effective treatment of acute lumbar sprain.