H Index Analysis For Chinese Academy Of Science Partial Academician

Objective: The researchers determined the appointment, promotion and prize money and belongings of the scientific research funding, often require the candidate evaluation and comparison, so that there is limited research resource for distribution, they have appeared in a variety of different types of evaluation standards. Traditional evaluation of scientific workers of the indices is personal influence with its own unique advantages, but also has its own inevitable shortcomings. For a long time, the scientists think about science, reasonable, objective and impartial evaluation of the quality of scientific journals and research staff of the performance issue, H index was born. This article is to take advantage of this new evaluation on the part of Chinese Academy of Sciences to personal performance evaluation, explore H index and scientists, to study the metrology related topics.Methods: We used Web of Science databases which developed with American Thomson Scientific Corporation, by"author"and"address"the search channel retrieves Chinese Academy of Science partial academician separately the article which published in 2000-2009, based on this calculated each academician's H index, will carry on statistics analysis finally.Results: To retrieve the results of statistics discovered that our country Academy of science biomedicine department partial academician's highest H index is 31; lowest are 2, H-index value of 12.5. The quotation frequency most to be high is 5693, lowest is 11, average 1114; the quotation average most to be high is 16.89, lowest is 1.38, average is 5.18.andstill had the disparity with the overseas some famous scientist's H index.Conclusion: The H index with Quotation frequency and Quotation average frequency to have certain relevance, the number in the selected 30 samples, There are seven members of H index reached Hirsch's "If you are engaged in research work 20 years later, H index can reach 20, will be able to count on is a successful scientist" this standard. But overall, researchers in China and the world famous scientists still have the disparity for H index. Quotation frequency and the whole level of scientific research are to restrict Chinese scientists H index.