| Research backgroundChina is a labor-intensive countries, the incidence of lumbar disc herniation is higher. Reported low back pain patient, according to China about 10%-15% of the patients diagnosed as LIDP., admitted to hospital because of low back pain patients diagnosed cases of the disease accounts for about 25%-40%. As the population increases, competition intensifies, the overload of work intensity and time, the incidence of the disease increased year by year, prominent part of a separate section from the outstanding development to two or even more prominent sections, increasing the degree of prominence, gradually the small age of the age, even young disc are common, impact the patient's life, work greatly. LIDP clinicians working on over the years the research work, in a safe, effective, non-invasive, low-cost and other concepts under the guidance of traditional Chinese medicine people who have a preferred massage therapy, massage in the original technology, clinicians Achieved many breakthroughs, summed up to create many new technologies, the formation of many schools, to improve the efficacy of massage therapy LIDP made a considerable contribution, but because there is no uniform, objective evaluation of efficacy, each of the said affected patients And medical practices on the effects of massage therapy LDIP awareness, and medical workers to improve their technology.Purpose and significanceThe purpose of this study is to complex requirements through the collection of 100 patients, observation of clinical symptoms, signs and affected more of its daily activities, the most common record; retrieve past have published literature, the clinical effect on LIDP Evaluation criteria, along with scales and other inductive, combined with the collected the most common clinical symptoms, choose where the relative objectivity, closely related to daily activities with the patient index, clinical signs, be made a quantitative scale (LIDP efficacy evaluation form), massage therapy techniques for evaluating the clinical efficacy of standard LIDP; through a unified evaluation of the efficacy of the standard, can be more objective and accurate proof of the good clinical efficacy of massage techniques and technology employed to guide patients to better understand the clinical efficacy of massage techniques, Correct choice of patients suitable for the treatment direction.ResultsExperimental group and control group general information, including age, sex, occupation, duration, highlighting the parts of, respectively, by t test and chi-square test, no significant difference between the two groups were comparable; of the two groups of patients before treatment Independent samples t test indicators, with homogeneity of variance; test group and control group after treatment efficacy total score for chi-square test, P> 0.10, no significant statistical difference; two group comparison, P<0.05, statistically Meaning;ConclusionsBy comparing before and after massage therapy techniques, two groups of patients in remission after treatment was significantly improved, that technique has a good massage on LIDP treatment, especially in the independent living ability in patients with well improved; the two groups were relatively independent life skills, Slightly higher than the control group, experimental group, but the experimental group was significantly higher than the correlation coefficient; before and after treatment by comparing the test group found changes in clinical signs after treatment in patients with lumbar spine and straight leg raising activity to improve the large back leg Mu Extensor strength and skin feeling less effective, take longer treatment time. |
PDF Full Text Request