The Study On Handwriting Of Shanghai Bamboo Silk Slips

Research into handwriting of Shanghai Museum collected bamboo has been a great success story,but it is s still got so much room for improvement in studying on method of handwriting,the study of quantitative,choosing typical handwriting and so on.For example,Li songru(2015)used below 7 characters to testify that Di Zi Wen(《弟子问》)and Jun Zi Wei Li(《君子为礼》)were identical:Ze(则),Wei(爲),Zhe(者),You(游),Gan(赣),Er(而),Fu(富).We found that Ze(则),You(游),Fu(富)only have occurred once in Jun Zi Wei Li(《君子为礼》),Wei(爲)has occurred twice in Jun Zi Wei Li(《君子为礼》),Gan(赣)has occurred twice in Di Zi Wen(《弟子问》).It’s hardly a coincidence that using the low frequency use of characters comes to identical conclusion.This article based on the Chu bamboo digital platform to exhausting analyze characters in Shanghai Museum collected bamboo and their radical.And based on the principles of objectivity,comparability,the paper discussed single characters and radical two levels of surveying handwriting of 70 documents in Shanghai Museum collected bamboo.From what has been discussed above,we may safely draw the following conclusion:1.They have the same handwriting,including two groups:Kongzi shi lun(《孔子诗论》)and Lu bang da han(《鲁邦大旱》),Cong zheng jia(《从政(甲篇)》)and Cong zheng yi(《从政(乙篇)》).2.They have the similar handwriting,including two types:one type is related to given texts,including 8 groups:Rong cheng shi(《容成氏》)and Cao mei zhi zhen(《曹沬之陈》),Tian zi jian zhou jia(《天子建州(甲本)》)and Tian zi jian zhou yi(《天子建州(乙本)》),Pengzu(《彭祖》)and Jing gong yue(《竞公疟》),Xi zhe jun lao(《昔者君老》)and Nei li(《内礼》),Min zhi fu mu(《民之父母》),Wu wang jian zuo(《武王践阼》)and Yuan yuan wen yu Kongzi(《颜渊问於孔子》),Zhengzi jia sang jia(《郑子家丧甲本》)and Zhengzi jia sang yi(《郑子家丧乙本》),Jun ren zhe he bi an zai jia(《君人者何必安哉甲本》)and Jun ren zhe he bi an zai yi(《君人者何必安哉乙本》),Fan wu liu xing jia(《凡物流形甲本》)and Fan wu liu yi(《凡物流形乙本》).The other type is that their handwriting is similar,including 43 texts:Di zi wen(《弟子问》),Jun zi wei li(《君子为礼》),San de(《三德》),Zhouyi(《周易》)Ji gengzi wen li Kongzi(《季庚子问与孔子》),Gengxian(《亘先》),Gui shen zhi ming(《鬼神之明》),Bao shuya yu xipeng zhi jian(《鲍叔牙与隰朋之谏》),Jingjian zhi nei(《竞建内之》)、Cheng wang ji bang(《成王既邦》)、Yongyue(《用曰》),Ming(《命》),Zhi shu nai yan(《志书乃言》)、Zhao wang hui shi-zhao wang yu zhe zhi du(《昭王毁室—昭王与龚之嘟》),Jian da wang bo han(《柬大王泊旱》),Ling wang sui sheng(《灵王遂申》),Chen gong zhi bin(《陈公治兵》),Bang ren bu cheng(《邦人不称》),Shiliu wen yu fuzi(《史蒥问於夫子》),Bu shu(《卜书》),Cai feng qu mu(《采风曲目》),Yi shi—Jiaojiao ming qian(《逸诗—交交鸣芊》),Yi shi—Duo xin(《逸诗—多薪》),Xiang bang zhi dao(《相邦之道》),Gui shen zhi ming·Rongshi Youcheng shi(《鬼神之明·融师有成氏》),Zhuangwang Jicheng·Shengong chen Lingwang(《庄王既成·申公臣灵王》),Ping wang wen Zhengshou(《平王问郑寿》),Ping wang yu wang Zimu(《平王与王子木》),Shen Zi yue gong jian(《慎子曰恭俭》),Wu ming(《吴命》),Zi dao e(《子道饿》),Wang ju(《王居》),Li song(《李颂》),Lan fu(《兰赋》),You huang jiang qi(《有皇将起》),Liu Li(《鶹鷅》),Chengwang wei Chengpu zhi xing jia(《成王为城濮之行(甲本)》),Chengwang wei Chengpu zhi xing yi(《成王为城濮之行(乙本)》),Juzhi wang tian xia·Gugong jian taigong Wang(《举治王天下·古公见太公望》),Juzhi wang tian xia·Wen wang fang zhi yu Shangfu ju zhi(《举治王天下·文王访之於尚父举治》),Juzhi wang tian xia·Yao wang tian xia(《举治王天下·尧王天下》),Juzhi wang tian xia·Shun wang tian xia(《举治王天下·舜王天下》),Juzhi wang tian xia·Yu wang tian xia(《举治王天下·禹王天下》).3.They have extent different handwriting,including 5 texts:Ziyi(《缁衣》),Xing qing lun(《性情论》),Zhong gong(《中弓》),Gu cheng jia fu(《姑成家父》)、Kongzi jian Ji hengzi(《孔子见季桓子》).This paper is divided into five chapters,the introduction of the first chapter,the purpose,content and meaning of this article,and the innovation of the article.The second chapter,from the perspective of vocabulary of examining the title writing on bo Jane:first of all,based on the frequency,coverage of the literature,topography characteristics such as validity principle,screening effectiveness study on the relationship between the title writing words 25:也、爲、可、者、则、是、邦、砠、鷑、道、智、事、能、溃、辈、旣、漧、圣、唯、砪、珟、敬、漼、义、贵;Secondly,to investigate the selection of key words in terms of structural classification,coverage,and writing.Finally,from the perspective of the main structure and the heterogeneity of the different writing habits,the paper has the uniqueness of the same words and the characters and the handwriting.The third chapter,from the perspective of Chinese character component of examining the title writing on bo Jane:based on the frequency,the principle of literature coverage,the configuration characteristics such as validity,effectiveness study on the relationship between the screen contents in handwriting Chinese character component 20:心、而、耳、隹、於、虍、民、皀、鼎、犬、夫、次、虎、身、鷫、舟、我、歺、中、欠;Secondly,to investigate the selection of key points by means of structural classification,coverage,and writing.Finally,from the perspective of the main structure,the heterogeneity and the heterogeneity of the different writing habits,the paper and the characters and the handwriting are unique in the paper.Chapter 4 summarizes the second and third chapters,summarizes the conclusion of the survey of the words and the side of the text,and summarizes the writing relationship between the various posts of bojane.Research projects in the fifth chapter,in two sections:the first section to Zi yi(《缁衣》),"Pengzu(《彭祖》)","Jing gong nve(《竞公疟》)"three papers handwriting relationship to study,for example,will be introduced in the study on the relationship between the ancient handwriting Chinese character component analysis;Views on academic controversy in the second quarter,"Jun zi wei li(《君子为礼》)"and"Di zi wen(《弟子问》)"whether to vocabulary and Chinese character component points of issues two levels of assessment,and determine the two documents of identity of the handwriting,unfavorable and co-editor,and from the Angle of handwriting characteristics,pointed out that"the gentleman as a"Jane 10 and 18"disciple asked Jane should not be split.The innovation of this article.It mainly shows in the following two points:For the method of ancient writing research,there are some examples of ancient writing studies that have been studied for example which easy to be distracted by default goals in the selection of the argument material,they are also influenced by the preset conclusion "preoccupation".Researchers tend to set the conclusions as the goal,they selectively listed the material that was "beneficial" to the conclusion.Apparently,In this method of research,It is difficult to draw conclusions from quantitative research.In this paper,with the help of the Chu Database Platform,using the method of argument of exhaustive quantitative analysis,Conducted on the form of the various forms of the original and the shape of each zigzag classification for handwriting survey.On this basis,according to the principle of validity,the material that does not have the similarities and differences to determine the effectiveness of the material excluded from the research field of vision,So as to ensure the validity and specificity of the study of handwriting.In terms of each piece of verdict:Firstly,existing studies believe that it has the same writing relationship between《缁衣》、《竞公疟》与《彭祖》,In this paper,through exhaustive quantitative handwriting survey,the author found that these three documents are not identical,.The handwriting is very different in Zi yi(《缁衣》),the handwriting is very similar between Jing gong nve(《竞公疟》)and Peng zu(《彭祖》).Secondly,It is considered that A and B should be combined into one,We believe that although the two literatures are very similar,but the difference in handwriting cannot be ignored,two articles should not be combined.Similar views are not listed here,see Chapter fourth&five.