Research On Implementation Of Sports Public Policy In China

After the Beijing Olympic Games, the country raised the goal of establishing a sports power, the realization of this goal requires specific sports public policy. In recent years, the country has proposed to establish and improve the public service system, sports is an important aspect of public service. The establishment of sports public service system relies on the sports public policy. The formulation of public policy does not necessarily lead to the expected results, effective implementation is the only way to achieve the policy objectives. At the same time, the implementation of part central level sports public policy existed many real problems, academia and the media have questioned on the implementation effect of the part sports public policy. Therefore, research on the sports field of public policy implementation should have a certain amount of theoretical and practical significance. The one hand, I hope to be able to construct building blocks for Public Policy Research’s theory, and provide informative material accumulation for sports public policy implementation studies. On the other hand, I hope provide some reference for policy implementation work of the relevant government departments.The dissertation examine the sports public policy implementation process with the literature method, active survey method, case law. and insight into the problems, characteristics, factors, from the process of the implementation, and try to explain the results of the study from different perspectives.The paper is divided into seven parts. The first part is the introduction, It explain the purpose and meaning why choose this topics, this study results summarized at home and abroad, the theoretical basis of the study, the research object, method, technology roadmap, hypotheses and possible innovations.The second part is the summary about the implementation of sports public policy, and the theories introduction. The main role is to pave the way for subsequent empirical research.The third part is empirical study on implementation of sports public. First, to sort out the sports public policies issued by the central government since1989, to provide an analytical basis for the founding of oriented classification and case selection, sports public policy perform. Then, on the one hand, to examine the two types of The policy’status of implementation at the execution chain of provincial-and municipal county-the township level of all levels sports administrative bodies with the perspective of "top-down", in accordance with comparison from the general process of the implementation of two types. The other hand, combined with the views from the policy target groups with field survey to verify the implementation results from "Bottom-up". The results showed that, the implementation of two kinds of policy has deviation. That the "visible" phenomenon, championitis, supply and demand does not match, both lack of resources and idle resources are the existing problems. In addition, the purpose of the sports public policy internal, during the execution of the overall emphasis Olympic Glorious, invested enormous human, financial, and material resources to form a fixed execution mode; while the implementation of a comprehensive fitness model is still in the "free play" insecurity, lack of human, financial and material resources. However, the emphasis of the sports departments of various levels of two types of policies are slightly different. Perform the main body of the implementation of the National Fitness power was not as strong as Olympic Glorious. Despite the implementation of the main emphasis in Olympic Glorious, but overall, the implementation of the two types of policies have achieved some results. Although some results have achieved at the same time, However the execution body is not made close contact with the target groups for the satisfaction of the results of the implementation is not high, the level of participation is not high. Despite the higher demand of the target groups of the fitness and entertainment, but they does not prone to take action to fight for their rights.The fourth part is the theoretical explanation of the sports public policy implementation. Interpret the results of the third part from a variety of angels. Governmental organizations’ selfish makes the implementation deviation, and the target groups’ selfish encouraged Governmental organizations’ deviant behavior. The effect of implementation is actually produced by the main and object groups. At the same time, that the policy itself is not scientific is also one of the influencing factors of sports public policy’implementation.The fifth part is the conclusions. At last, I showed the research inadequacies and the following study.