| Objective:To observe the clinical effects of treating Migraine by the acupuncture therapy mainly with pricking blood therapy on the head, meanwhile to compare the clinical effects of the acupuncture therapy mainly with pricking blood therapy on the head and conventional methods. Try to find a effective, economic and safe way to treat such patients. The effective method can light the side effect of medical, decrease the recurrence rate, elevate the life quality and survival rate, lessen the patients' economic burden and so on.Methods:1. Sixty cases of Migraine received the treatment who met the clinical research requirements were randomly divided into two groups, which including the acupuncture therapy mainly with pricking blood therapy on the head group (Treatment group,30cases), Control group (30cases).2. The information of the patients of two groups, such as duration, age and other basic situations have no significant differences.(1) Treatment group Acupoint:Erjian point (Ipsilateral), Baihui point, Quchi point(Ipsilateral), Neiguan point(Ipsilateral), Waiguan point (Ipsilateral), Yangfu point (Ipsilateral), Taichong point(Ipsilateral), Ligou point(Ipsilateral), Zusanli point(Ipsilateral), Yongquan point (Ipsilateral). The main points, Erjian point (Ipsilateral), Baihui point, take the pricking blood therapy. Such points as Quchi point(Ipsilateral), Neiguan point (Ipsilateral), Waiguan point (Ipsilateral), Yangfu point (Ipsilateral), Taichong point(Ipsilateral), Ligou point(Ipsilateral), Zusanli point(Ipsilateral), Yongquan point (Ipsilateral)take the Moxibustion.(2)Control group Each patient was treated with Flunarizine Hydrochloride Capsules for10mg before bedtime everyday, in case of sever headache, these patients can take ibuprofen sustained-release capsules for0.3g temporary.3. Period of treatment:The frequency of acupunction is once2days, three times a week,1week is one course, the observation time is4weeks. The index include:VAS, the number of headache attacks, Headache duration, associated symptoms, and so on.Results:1.The comparison of the score of VASBefore treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups on the score of VAS (P>0.05). After4weeks therapies, compared with scores before the treatment, there were significant difference in the two groups on the score of VAS (P<0.05). After4weeks therapies, there were no significant differences between the two groups on the score of VAS (P>0.05).2. The comparison of the score of the number of headache attacksBefore treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups on the score of the number of headache attacks (P>0.05). After4weeks therapies, compared with scores before the treatment, there were significant difference in the two groups on the score of the number of headache attaeks (P<0.05). After4weeks therapies, there were no significant differences between the two groups on the score of the number of headache attacks (P>0.05).3. The comparison of the score of the headache severityBefore treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups on t the score of the headache severity (P>0.05). After4weeks therapies, compared with scores before the treatment, there were significant difference in the two groups on the score of the headache severity(P<0.05). After4weeks therapies, there were no significant differences between the two groups on the score of the headache severity (P>0.05).4. The comparison of the score of the headache durationBefore treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups on t the score of the headache duration (P>0.05). After4weeks therapies, compared with scores before the treatment, there were significant difference in the two groups on the score of the headache duration(P<0.05). After4weeks therapies, there were no significant differences between the two groups on the score of the headache duration (P>0.05).5. The comparison of the score of the associated symptomsBefore treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups on the score of the associated symptoms (P>0.05). After4weeks therapies, compared with scores before the treatment, there were significant difference in the treatment group on the score of the associated symptoms(P<0.05), there were no significant difference in the control group on the score of the associated symptoms (P>0.05). After4weeks therapies, there were no significant differences between the two groups on the score of the associated symptoms(P>0.05).6.The comparison of the curative effect of the two groupsThe acupuncture therapy mainly with pricking blood therapy and the therapy of Flunarizine Hydrochloride Capsules all have good curative effect. The total effective rate is:the treatment group76.67%; the control group70%, there were no significant differences (P>0.05).Conclusion:The method of acupuncture therapy mainly with pricking blood therapy and Flunarizine Hydrochloride Capsules are effective in treating simple obesity. The efficacy of the two kinds of therapy is equal. But, in the aspect of improving migraine symptoms, The method of acupuncture therapy mainly with pricking blood therapy on the head is more effective than The method of Flunarizine Hydrochloride Capsules. |